It said there were no life threatening injuries IDENTIFIED. If he died because he wasn't getting enough oxygen as they claim, that would not have left any injuries behind to identify.

And it said that there were drugs in his system, not that he OD'ed on drugs.

I'm not trying to be a fuddy duddy or rain on any parades here, but that report isn't making any definitive statements saying he died of an OD.

I think this is a case of people interpreting something to mean what they want, and not what it says.

I don't know why anyone would think the media should do or say anything about this, anyway. It doesn't say anything different than what it was saying a few years ago.

People are just reading into it what they want it to say. Sorry.

Please note- I'm not saying if he died from lack of oxygen or not. I honestly don't know. And honestly, I don't care. That may seem crass, but it's true. I was tired of hearing about this guy years ago, and I'm still tired of hearing about him.

So, to make it clear, before someone tries to draw me into an argument or tries to convince me of whatever: I'm saying that the report linked above does not definitively say what the OP claims. It's how they're interpreting the report, which, again, does not make the claim the OP states.