Why did she plead guilty, unless she knew her claims were bogus from the start? Was she simply caught up in the moment (making her a gullible fool), or did she actually believe in her Kraken Cases?
What is her play now? Why guilty, and why agree to testify against other defendants?
Turncoat?
I here ya bro ,but it aint that simple,dont matter who you are in our justice system,had a lawyer tell me one time ,'YOU DONT KNOW WHO YOUR DEALING WITH" ,so she did what she had to do ,cant judge until your sittin where she was,she didnt take a Fulford plea because she plead guilty but her choice was literally go to trial be found guilty go to prison for who knows how many years ,or do what she did with no chance of jail belittled by the state is what they really wanted and live to fight another day.
I am not judging anybody. I am just pointing out what she is doing. I pity her.
Do what is right and have faith. Anything short of that is a mistake. People who give up and have no faith will always find a way to justify their choices. We learn from our mistakes. She is about to learn a very valuable lesson.
Let's see what Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman will do once Sydney's & Chesebro's evidence is presented in their separate trials. Plea deal or plead not guilty?