They do that for nuclear reactor containment structures, which results in a fortress. Any evidence that they do that for skyscrapers? You could say that, insofar as the collisions themselves were concerned, the Twin Towers withstood them. It was the fire that precipitated the collapse.
What is it you think I don't know about? Nearly every "truther" doesn't understand structural failure, so far as I have experienced. The presence or absence of the columns in the exterior wall doesn't really make a difference in what happened, since the core columns were also necessary to carry the building loads.
Are the outer walls structural or not? That sounds like a big thing you ought to be sure of before you start pontificating.
You also don't seem to know whether high rise buildings are stressed for plane strikes. So what do you know, exactly?
As for fires, have you managed to find a single similar structure that collapsed into its own base at free-fall speed due to fire? As an example this one is still standing.
If you watch 57:45 the cars look like they've been through same "toasting" process like the cars in Maui. I'm certain that DEWs was used during 9/11 on both buildings. I used to think that it was thermite, but it doesn't explain the dustification of both buildings. There is barely any debris on the site after the buildings went down.
I had seen that film but it was a while ago now. There are so many coincidences and unanswered questions that it has to be regarded as suspicious at a minimum. There is the security chief who was GWB's cousin. There is the interesting list of people who never showed up at the office that day. The people who had full access to the building. The vans supplying materials at strange hours. There are the ones who shorted airline stock. The fact that the buildings needed the asbestos removing at huge cost. The recent acquisition of a lease by Silverstein who tried to claim twice on the insurance - once for each plane. I believe that failed.
What happens after a serious fire-related incident? You put out the fire then call in the forensics team. In this case they called in Mueller who packed off all the evidence to China ASAP. The list goes on and on. And all that is before we look at the structure, explosives, thermite, dancing Israelis, Operation Northwoods and buildings collapsing without being directly hit by a plane etc.
My main point now is that you do not seem to know what you are talking about!
Another thing you seem to have missed: The buildings WERE stressed to combat collisions with planes.
They do that for nuclear reactor containment structures, which results in a fortress. Any evidence that they do that for skyscrapers? You could say that, insofar as the collisions themselves were concerned, the Twin Towers withstood them. It was the fire that precipitated the collapse.
What is it you think I don't know about? Nearly every "truther" doesn't understand structural failure, so far as I have experienced. The presence or absence of the columns in the exterior wall doesn't really make a difference in what happened, since the core columns were also necessary to carry the building loads.
Are the outer walls structural or not? That sounds like a big thing you ought to be sure of before you start pontificating.
You also don't seem to know whether high rise buildings are stressed for plane strikes. So what do you know, exactly?
As for fires, have you managed to find a single similar structure that collapsed into its own base at free-fall speed due to fire? As an example this one is still standing.
Is he still going at it? Watch out! Either his ignorant or purposely muddying the waters.
https://youtu.be/vadSaWyiozg
If you watch 57:45 the cars look like they've been through same "toasting" process like the cars in Maui. I'm certain that DEWs was used during 9/11 on both buildings. I used to think that it was thermite, but it doesn't explain the dustification of both buildings. There is barely any debris on the site after the buildings went down.
I had seen that film but it was a while ago now. There are so many coincidences and unanswered questions that it has to be regarded as suspicious at a minimum. There is the security chief who was GWB's cousin. There is the interesting list of people who never showed up at the office that day. The people who had full access to the building. The vans supplying materials at strange hours. There are the ones who shorted airline stock. The fact that the buildings needed the asbestos removing at huge cost. The recent acquisition of a lease by Silverstein who tried to claim twice on the insurance - once for each plane. I believe that failed.
What happens after a serious fire-related incident? You put out the fire then call in the forensics team. In this case they called in Mueller who packed off all the evidence to China ASAP. The list goes on and on. And all that is before we look at the structure, explosives, thermite, dancing Israelis, Operation Northwoods and buildings collapsing without being directly hit by a plane etc.