Catherine Herridge“I told ABC that their story was largely inaccurate. People will have to judge for themselves the decision to run it anyway.” - The Great Awakening

Catherine Herridge“I told ABC that their story was largely inaccurate. People will have to judge for themselves the decision to run it anyway.” (twitter.com)

posted 1 year ago by purkiss80 1 year ago by purkiss80 +92 / -0

8 comments

8 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (8)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– JollyRancherHard 0 points 1 year ago +2 / -2

The tweet is quoting Mark Meadows lawyer.

So that's a source. And the motivation of that source is known - to protect his client.

One of the ABC reporters tweeted today. And it seems like two things are going on.

Meadows does not seem to have an immunity deal RIGHT NOW.
Meadows testified to the grand jury back in MARCH under court ordered immunity.

So this is before the Jack Smith Indictment of Trump. Mark Meadows is an "undicted co-conspirator" in that indictment.

So we don't know if Meadows has a deal to flip or is trying to negotiate a deal to flip RIGHT NOW.

This is what ABC said about the court ordered immunity

Under the immunity order from Smith's team, the information Meadows provided to the grand jury earlier this year can't be used against him in a federal prosecution.

That immunity came after a lawyer for Meadows requested that his client be immunized to testify before the grand jury, sources familiar with the matter said. A senior Justice Department official signed off on the request and an immunity order was then issued by U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge at the federal court in Washington, D.C., days before Meadows appeared before the grand jury in March, sources said.

Had Meadows not been granted immunity, prosecutors expected him to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, sources said.

https://x.com/KFaulders/status/1717161779577417908?s=20

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -1 ▼

– JollyRancherHard -1 points 1 year ago +1 / -2

A question I have is why is this coming out now....if they are talking about conversations that happened back in March.

I'm thinking that some lawyers have gotten discovery on Meadows grand jury testimony. Meadows is a defendant in Georgia along with other defendants.

So it's possible this info was included in the discovery materials in GA.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q