You are the news now. Handle w/ care.
What a narrative spike! Regardless of opinions about the man - or perhaps because of them - the election of Johnson as Speaker appears to be a rather BIG narrative moment.
While it wasn't quite the 15 vote drama that ushered in McCarthy with Trump's approval and a whole host of Maga-won concessions, the past 3-week period of non-Speakership - coming exactly at the 'right time' to prevent knee-jerk reactions in the House to the Israel situation - feels like it has heightened expectations, emotions and FOCUS.
Lots of pedes are rushing to see, or trying to evaluate - is Johnson a good guy? Is he a bad guy? Is this a win/ Is this a loss?
"His first action was to support Israel! He's a bad guy! IT's a LOSS!"
"Already the Left Liberals are losing their minds! He's a good guy! It's a WIN!"
"Pencil Neck hates him! It's a win! He's a good guy!"
This sort of response is understandable. After all, our pedes are researchers and digital soldiers. We have eyes on things that a much larger majority of Americans, nay, humans, do not have their eyes on. There is a strong tendency among us to want to figure out exactly what is going on, as soon as possible, even though by now most of us recognize the fact that there is a LOT going on that we simply do not know about, in terms of who is directing it and what impact it is happening, or even if it factually IS happening.
There is one thing, however, that I think almost all of us will agree on: whatever is happening NOW - and has been happening for the past 7 years - is monumental in nature. Never has more been at stake, for the US, for the world, for humanity.
And because of that, it's only natural to be emotionally tense and emotionally invested. That's correct and right. If we didn't care, we would not be here.
Another point many of us would agree on is that we are involved in, directly, an information psychological war being conducted using fifth generation warfare. And for that reason, it's important that we examine ourselves, reflect on our equipment, our armor, and our practice.
Our equipment is our mind, our capacity to reason, think, see in and see through. Our armor is our spirit and psychological makeup, which defines our resilience and resistance to disinformation, to psyop manipulation from the enemy, and our own capacity to utilize our equipment to maximum effect.
What brings these both together is our practice. For vets who were tracking Q back in late 2017, 2018, we've had a lot of training, simply due to the reams of experience we've garnered over the years, through trial and error, making mistakes and re-adjusting and learning.
For newcomers, developing our practice is a constant challenge, as this part of the war is far more challenging than the period when Q was posting ever was.
The 48-Hour Rule
One practice we know is the 48-hour rule. But does it apply to Johnson?
The 48 hour rule has been a technique for not jumping on a report and waiting to see whether or not the report is actually factual or not.
Example: Israel bombed the Hospital!!! > 48 hours: Hamas missiled a hospital
The current reports seem rather conclusive that Johnson has been elected Speaker, so I think we can accept that as factual.
However, we are in an information war, actually a 5G war that is taking place on myriad fronts, all the time, one of those being the political front (on various levels, tho).
As to the impact the Johnson will have, whether him being speaker turns out to be a positive for MAGA and America, that might take a bit more time than 2 days. Tactics, strategy, maneuvering, these are all important in the political sphere.
Case in point, a lot of people REACTING to Johnson saying his first order of business will be to support Israel. But I resonate with Professor Patriot's comment which he posted on Telegram:
I can understand why people think that Mike Johnson might have his priorities misplaced when his, “first order of business,” was support for Israel.
I’m just going to lightly disagree.
The first order of business was not truly the first order of business. It was no business at all. It was just a lob. “Hey, Israel, we support you.” No wrangling or heavy discussion. It’s like blowing out the candles.
Business will begin when things like the border, war funding, election interference, impeachment, etc… are addressed, and those topics will require long negotiations and wrangling and beating each other up for position. That could have never happened today.
Johnson took a nice victory lap and threw the crowd a kiss.
Give him more than an hour to address the hard stuff.
We are utterly unrealistic in our expectations.
We need to get away from the practice of reacting to this or that element, rather than observing the strategic unfolding of manoeuvres for eventual gain of territory.
I think all anons who are aware that the DS has been laundering money via their various overseas wars, but the situation in Israel is different from the situation in Ukraine on (what seems) a large number of fronts.
Wins are nice, but not all that look like wins are wins, and not all that appear to be losses are losses. A possible Case in Point: 2020 election being stolen. It looks like a massive loss, but if in fact it was 'allowed' to take place because it was necessary in order to destroy the deep state and the Cabal regime, then is it a loss, or a win (the outcome remains to be seen, 48 hour rule, or 48 month rule, notwithstanding).
Personally, I'm not really that interested in what Johnson himself does over the next few weeks. What I'm really curious about now is why Jordan etc, could NOT gain unanimous support from the Republicans in congress, but why (or how) Johnson could. That's really got me wondering.
Let's watch and observe as things play out. Fruits over time are the clincher. For now, I think we should apply more than 48 hours before deciding if Johnson is our guy or not. I suggest watching DJT and following his lead. He's the five-star general in this confusing, chaotic war.
TLDQ: Both @PapiTrumpo and @RepMikeJohnson appeared to know he would be selected as speaker and called it out in their tweets before the vote.
This is verified through the photo in drop #3826 of the flag and pillars behind the House podium. It is referenced with common themes by all of Scavino, Q, PapiTrumpo, and Mike Johnson.
====== Summary ======
It begins with Scavino all the way back on Feb 4 2020. After Trump gives the SOTU Scavino posts this a picture of the flag and tags it #BehindScenes #SOTU2020. Pelosi commits a felony and rips up the House's copy of the SOTU.
A few hours later Q references it in drop #3826 and adds "Sometimes the past can find the future." Which AFAIK didn't really meant anything at the time (from comments on the archive it doesn't seem to have acquired any special interpretation).
A couple days later on February 6th, a Congressman with close to zero name recognition (Mike Johnson) goes on some TV interviews and states Pelosi committed a felony at SOTU by ripping up her copy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk7ON0RJzy8
Fast forward to oh, 3 years and then some later, late night Oct 24 2023. @papitrumpo drops two tweets related to Johnson. One of referencing him as a "quiet man" who is about to act, and another showing him in front of Pelosi's office with the Dre's "Next Episode" theme playing.
The following morning, Wednesday, Oct 25, 11:02 AM, hours before the vote, Johnson apparently calls his own shot (that he'll be elected) by referencing the same House flag photo in a tweet.
Later that afternoon Johnson is elected as predicted. Benny Johnson drops the Johnson interview from back in 2020 to refresh our memory. All players here seem aware of the House flag and its significance. All are referencing it in their posts in related ways at different times.
Sometimes the past finds the future, through the House flag and the words "In God We Trust", and drop #3826. Q team just flexing their control here and letting us know Johnson is "part of the plan". They are also letting us know @PapiTrumpo is a legitimate Trump alternate and not just someone expertly fooling around. They are letting us know folks like @BennyJohnson are around to drop us some clues to help put the pieces together.
Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, I think they want us to review that SOTU and Pelosi's actions, and maybe have her actions in mind as we analyze Johnson's actions.
Ok. Wow. Thanks. Excellent documentation layout.
Questions:
a. Is your conclusion here that Q team had Johnson himself lined up as far back as Feb 2020, or that scavino and Q were putting in place the Tweet/drop as a placeholder to be employed at a future time when useful to set up a proof (future proves past), such as in this case?
b. the @papitrumpo tweets indicate prior knowledge. Is this possible because Il Donaldo has his ears to the ground (aka has serious connections) and is hinting at that, or if not, why do you discount that possibility?
c. By Il Donaldo being 'a legitimate trump alternate', do you mean the account is actually DJT himself (meaning him or his team, his designated instrument)?
d. The house flag can to some extent symbolize the speaker, because it is draped at the head of the House where the Speaker resides, right? At the various players here referencing the flag, or merely accentuating the speakership?
e. In trying to decipher proofs, I usually approach them from the devil's advocates perspective, attempting to pull them apart or find other viable explanations other than an orchestrated operation. To which I ask:
Could Il Donaldo be an insider with powerful connections, and so have had foreknowledge?
Johnson himself would very likely (must?) know he was going to be put up, so his tweet makes sense in that context alone.
Could benny johnson, just like other folks, be reposting stuff about Johnson now that he became speaker? Or are you saying he's an operative?
How can these possibilities be dismissed or otherwise addressed? I'm keen to understand, (because of the loose way I see a lot of pedes jump at straws, envision connections that I think are not there or explainable by other reasons).
I'm intrigued by the last statement, because I think it shows strategic thinking, which I think is important and critical in putting together the proper picture.
In raising the questions I do, I guess I'm attempting to plumb exactly why you find this particular collation of events/posts compelling.
Why, for example, do you draw a connection between Il Donaldo posting at 12:41 (whose time is that? DC? Florida?) and drop #1241>
It's probably a big ask. Your summary here is top notch and I want to get to that place to see (if I can) what you see, but you've already gone above and beyond.
Much appreciated.
a. Not at that level of specificity. I think Q team probably layers their plans and MJ was just one of many options. Keep in mind they're working backwards, not forwards. Q has claimed their apparent prescience derives from control.
b/c. My theory is the same individuals that run Trump's main accounts run @papitrumpo. Don't claim to know how much of either is Trump himself. All the video work indicates a deep and talented team.
d. Not sure what you mean by accentuating the speakership. IMO they're presenting the flag in a way that can be understood one way by the public and other ways by anons/cabal/white hats. The message to us is that MJ is part of the plan.
e1. As before, I think @papitrumpo is managed by the same team as Trump's official accounts. He's on point too consistently for it not to be.
e3. No way to know his official status but the most prolific posters seem to have a designed, full time role. I think it's hard to post at that level and it not be your job.
e4. @papitrumpo could be an extremely skilled shit poster and researcher with some inside contacts. @SpeakerJohnson could just like to post imagery of the House Chambers that coincidentally lines up with Q. The fact that Johnson called out Pelosi for ripping up the SOTU could just be a fun coincidence.
e5. Regarding #1241, we are on the verge of WW3 with a possible attack on/from Iran at any time. It also had "Marker" on it, was referenced by what I believe is a Trump account, and had numerous comments on money laundering being performed through foreign aid. The crux of McCarthy's failed speakership was breaking his promise to put Ukraine and other war funding up for isolated up/down votes. He broke that promise and Gaetz called him on it.
Mostly I thought it was an important detail to put on people's radar, but I fear it may have confused the core message of the analysis. I'm considering condensing my analysis but I hate leaving these little tangents off when they seem relevant.
Regarding times, I always do my best to convert to EST, to the point of switching my time zone before snapping the screenies. I always source Tweets/Truths so frens can double check.
I enjoy answering questions and having my analysis challenged. It's the only way I can be aware of flaws in my thinking and make improvements.
I'm going to meditate on these points. For me, Q proofs have always come in the form of numerous other real world evidences. The q drops and q proofs don't seem to do it for me like those other things.
But what I've seen of Johnson (a few clips!) already has me intrigued. The McCarthy, Gaetz game plan for up until October feels orchestrated, along with the last three weeks of non-speakership. I'll be very interested to see how things unfold.
I never followed Il Donaldo much, so no real comment there.
But I'm liking the idea of adding your breakdown here to the mix I have from other sources and origins, and seeing what comes up.
Thanks for the attention to detail!