Nah, I don't think it's that weird. A fanatic anti-gun nut who is also local to the event would naturally jump to this type of thing. Just like a pro 2nd amendment blogger might be the first to seize on a recent ruling in either direction. In a way his following it is natural, after the reports surfaced, even if being first is unusual. But if he was following the dude before the reports, the likelihood of coincidence is virtually nil.
It must be first ever follower on the account becausr it would be nigh impossible to figure out who the first person was to follow the shooter during the event/reporting of the event.
Nah, I don't think it's that weird. A fanatic anti-gun nut who is also local to the event would naturally jump to this type of thing. Just like a pro 2nd amendment blogger might be the first to seize on a recent ruling in either direction. In a way his following it is natural, after the reports surfaced, even if being first is unusual. But if he was following the dude before the reports, the likelihood of coincidence is virtually nil.
The other potential information coming out about the person following him is also questionable though. It's all things that compound it.
It must be first ever follower on the account becausr it would be nigh impossible to figure out who the first person was to follow the shooter during the event/reporting of the event.