Well, let me explain.

Ritter says that HAMAS was originally created as a (well-funded) Palestinian bogeyman, to replace the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization who were becoming a nuisance all over Europe)- a bit like ISIS or al Qaida, or the pre-Taliban Mujahedeen. So this would be during the bad old eighties, when the PLO were terrorizing and bombing capital cities in Europe. The claim was that HAMAS was controlled opposition, so the organization was encouraged to use legal bureaucratic structures and attract 'sensible' people to the movement.

What has happened, just like with the Taliban (which mainly attracted university students), is that enough right-thinking pedes and pepes have joined the movement for all the right reasons. The Taliban, like HAMAS, are now in government and conducting elections to prove it. All the aunties and uncles are now also voting for proper help: both HAMAS and the Taliban are serious about helping their countrymen - from some accounts, only about 10% of their funding goes to Military matters now - the rest is used in governance and humanitarian aid projects. And yes, they are connected, and have human infrastructure to pull that off.

So the OP is telling the truth: Soros likely funded HAMAS, because the DS needed controlled bogeymen in order to persecute oppressed populations (as they paraded around their imaginary chessboard, they had to rinse and repeat the formula). In this case, the PLO had done its dash, and HAMAS was quickly set up to replace it.

But I'm sure the dish ran away with the spoon in some cases. This is what happens when one decentralizes, globally. The WEF-masters write about decentralization, but pretend that they can somehow keep the reins in their grubby little hands, and are busily trying to re-enforce the old hierarchies. LOL. In the end, Soros is just a shrivelled, little, evil munchkin.

PEPEs know differently: the truth is more important.