He’s been at this for quite some time. Check his last 20 substack articles, at least. Go to the comments on every single one where the discussions get detailed and revelatory. Dig, Anon, dig. You’re joining a meal just as the starters are coming out, and wondering why you can’t get any pudding, laddie!
Start with his wiki… I have spent weeks studying this schism and I am a massive fucking fan of Kirsch et al, and I gotta say…I think Crawford is the real deal which is not to say Kirsch et al aren’t, but he is raising matters requiring scrutiny.
Check out Charles Wright also. He goes for Malone, David Martin, Kirsch etc often. There are others too forming some kind of rearguard action. Is it justified and honest? Who knows? But something might be rotten in the MFM paradise…
Good article. I've noticed the controlled opposition thing in the MFM a bit back which is why I do not engage anymore.
He’s been at this for quite some time. Check his last 20 substack articles, at least. Go to the comments on every single one where the discussions get detailed and revelatory. Dig, Anon, dig. You’re joining a meal just as the starters are coming out, and wondering why you can’t get any pudding, laddie!
Start with his wiki… I have spent weeks studying this schism and I am a massive fucking fan of Kirsch et al, and I gotta say…I think Crawford is the real deal which is not to say Kirsch et al aren’t, but he is raising matters requiring scrutiny.
https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=rounding_the_earth:chaos_agents
Check out Charles Wright also. He goes for Malone, David Martin, Kirsch etc often. There are others too forming some kind of rearguard action. Is it justified and honest? Who knows? But something might be rotten in the MFM paradise…
https://substack.com/profile/64595600-charles-wright
This reeks of the divide and conquer strategies we've seen in many other movements