1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

All evidence can be fabricated. Don't fool yourself. And setting the skepticism bar too high will increase your false-negative rate.

Ask yourself, which is worse in this case: false positive or false negative?

20
metapriest 20 points ago +20 / -0

I believe the word OP is looking for is "wood chipper"

3
metapriest 3 points ago +3 / -0

The diagram shows "prediction score" which is a machine learning term. Its downstream of "timeline mixer" which suggests that they are using machine learning to sort the timeline.

A benign way to do this would be to sort by relevance in some neutral way. A hostile way to do this is to sort by political leanings, so one side looks more numerous than the other. A truly neutral way to do it would be to just randomly sort it, so everyone has equal chance of being at the top of the timeline.

14
metapriest 14 points ago +15 / -1

Writ of certiorari means they are appealing a lower court's decision. The SC doesn't have to accept it. Does anyone know if this has made it onto the docket or not?

9
metapriest 9 points ago +9 / -0

I wonder how many planets these critters have been kicked off of...

5
metapriest 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think both the elections were a sting and they needed to watch both presidential and midterm elections to capture all the bad ones. If they only did presidential, then half of congress could be sleepers and we wouldn't have proof in the same way.

It could be done using another heuristic, but this approach is the credibly neutral one, especially since R's and D's will both get caught in the dragnet.

2
metapriest 2 points ago +2 / -0

If we used open source tech for elections, this would be much easier to verify.

6
metapriest 6 points ago +6 / -0

Keep in mind, the enemy has two goals. First, to win the election by any means necessary. Second, if that fails, start a civil war, bring in the UN, "get all the dumb ones to kill each other".

Making the fraud obvious helps the second goal.

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

But this guy makes a good point. Elections should ideally be auditable by any citizen. That builds trust, plausible neutrality. Otherwise, even if its a fair election, but no one thinks its fair, then you have a problem.

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they need the cheating to be extra obvious for the dummies in the back?

Not super reassuring tho

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

The value of a pile of coins (or shares) is usually computed as top_price_for_one_coin * num_coins, because this is easy to compute, but its a bullshit statistic. If you start selling, the price goes down, its like an auction, sell to the highest bidder, then next highest, and so on.

So we you see market-caps or "Jeff Bezos is worth $100B" just remember, nominal asset prices don't mean you could actually sell it and get that much cash for it.

2
metapriest 2 points ago +2 / -0

Different stat. That's trading volume, not value. If we send $1 back and forth 1 trillion times, that's a trillion in volume, even tho it was just the same dollar sloshing around.

But yes, crypto prices do reflect inflation, they are marketed as inflation resistant assets for this reason.

2
metapriest 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its like when they torture someone to get a confession. Both parties know its not true, but the self betrayal is a special kind of food for these demons.

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me introduce you to the references section of wikipedia where you can browse more "authoritative" sources.

Or maybe you can link to the relevant part of the constitution...but what if the website is lying?!? Probably need to go to the museum yourself and read the cursive written on hemp paper. Then take a picture.

But no one will believe you, because knowledge is fake and gay.

And nobody can read cursive anyways.

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to wikipedia, the speaker of the house does not have to be an incumbent representative, altho it always has been. It says the house votes for the speaker after inauguration, so its possible Trump could do this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

S is the snake, T is the rod?

There's some masonic rant about S & T that I heard one time...

13
metapriest 13 points ago +15 / -2

S & T are capitalized

S + T = $ = caduceus

??

1
metapriest 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of humanity would. Look up the word "fornication". That's basically everybody. This passage is calling for a genocide worse than the great reset.

view more: Next ›