What about the donation Fraud that WinRed & ShareBlue both have had exposed by James O'Keefe?
Is it possible that the clerk had their name used by some other group fraudulently to maximize donations?
Is it possible that those groups were put into place to provide cover for legit violators to be able to point a finger at them & claim innocence?
Are we allowing our bias to give us a knee jerk "gotcha" reaction?
Did White Hats use the over donation limit in their name to create this issue?
As much as I want to cheer about this clerk donating too much, I also have to admit there is the potential that it was done in their name without their consent too & we just need to look at the details more. Maybe the facts will prove them to be in violation.
At the very least I see this as some good noise to pay attention to & see where the data takes us when we get more.
Playing Devil's Advocate here:
As much as I want to cheer about this clerk donating too much, I also have to admit there is the potential that it was done in their name without their consent too & we just need to look at the details more. Maybe the facts will prove them to be in violation.
At the very least I see this as some good noise to pay attention to & see where the data takes us when we get more.