Yep, you can still find copies of the original, but the going price is around $200. Yeah, the 1991 version is a collectors item now. I found two that were signed by the man himself. They were in the THOUSANDS.
Probably because they finally realized the "Protocols" were a hoax produced by the Tsarist government of Russia to rationalize their pogroms and anti-Semitic policies. This backstory was elaborated by Konrad Heiden in his 600-page history of the rise of the Nazi Party, "The Fuehrer" (1944).
Heiden was a German journalist who was "there" throughout the emergence and the 1933 rise to power of Adolf Hitler. Once Hitler became Chancellor, Heiden fled the country for the West. It is a fascinating read. The rise to power was haphazard, full of chance, and hinged on Hitler's obsession to rule.
If only their removal would indeed make people think.
I've done my digging. What point from Carr do you want to make? If you are upholding the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Konrad Heiden was not the first to identify Matvei Golovinski as one of the authors, confirmed by recent contemporary research, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matvei_Golovinski (The entry is sourced, so spare me the obligatory "you can't trust Wikipedia.")
Yep, you can still find copies of the original, but the going price is around $200. Yeah, the 1991 version is a collectors item now. I found two that were signed by the man himself. They were in the THOUSANDS.
Probably because they finally realized the "Protocols" were a hoax produced by the Tsarist government of Russia to rationalize their pogroms and anti-Semitic policies. This backstory was elaborated by Konrad Heiden in his 600-page history of the rise of the Nazi Party, "The Fuehrer" (1944).
Heiden was a German journalist who was "there" throughout the emergence and the 1933 rise to power of Adolf Hitler. Once Hitler became Chancellor, Heiden fled the country for the West. It is a fascinating read. The rise to power was haphazard, full of chance, and hinged on Hitler's obsession to rule.
If only their removal would indeed make people think.
Um, wrong! Go back and do some digging; might I suggest William Guy Carr's "Pawns in the Game" for a start...
I've done my digging. What point from Carr do you want to make? If you are upholding the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," Konrad Heiden was not the first to identify Matvei Golovinski as one of the authors, confirmed by recent contemporary research, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matvei_Golovinski (The entry is sourced, so spare me the obligatory "you can't trust Wikipedia.")
If you'd actually listened he's stated it's way older than that. Golovinski is just a plagiarist