Thanks for my morning laugh. I offer references that you can check out for yourself, and you respond with great irritation---and no refutation of the references. You immediately launch into insults and name-calling. Then wrap up with a shot at a subject that was not in issue between us. ("When in doubt, shoot the chicken.")
This pretty much tells me that you have no interest in truth, but are only interested in bias confirmation. For you, the anon watchword "Question everything," does not apply to your own bias. I have to wonder what aspect of your personality is threatened by the knowledge that the "Protocols" are a hoax. It would demolish some key principle that you cherish, no? It looks to be an ugly principle.
Thanks for my morning laugh. I offer references that you can check out for yourself, and you respond with great irritation---and no refutation of the references. You immediately launch into insults and name-calling. Then wrap up with a shot at a subject that was not in issue between us. ("When in doubt, shoot the chicken.")
This pretty much tells me that you have no interest in truth, but are only interested in bias confirmation. For you, the anon watchword "Question everything," does not apply to your own bias. I have to wonder what aspect of your personality is threatened by the knowledge that the "Protocols" are a hoax. It would demolish some key principle that you cherish, no? It looks to be an ugly principle.