Once elections are fixed (made fair) term limits could be bad - it's possible that good people will need longer than a fixed term to raise the next generation, or finish projects of importance, and with free elections why force them out? any corruption could be voted out in secure elections so that is less of a worry. The problem has not been term limits but fraudulent voting keeping people in even when they are terrible.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Simply put, if our elections are not fixed, nothing will change.
If our elections are not "secured" - the issue is they are fixed. I know - semantics, but it is the first thing I thought of so I bet other people did as well.
Do you secure something that is broken? Semantics right?
But they are fixed, that's how joe won.
Fixed as in rigged