This barely pinged onto the radar of liberals but it did show up for a moment:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143152764

The details of the case are worth reviewing because so much of how it was handled differed tremendously from the Trump cases:

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518

https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-judge-bridgeport-ganim-mayor-election-1e6d23567703c55430968ffdaa0b6369

Firstly, it appears the Masons on the local police force failed to bury the evidence, or have a mole in their brotherhood:

https://www.ctpublic.org/news/investigative/2023-09-18/gomes-will-challenge-bridgeport-democratic-primary-results-in-court

The videos, apparently recorded by municipal surveillance cameras outside the city’s government center building, captured widespread attention over the weekend, and prompted an inquiry by Bridgeport police, who are investigating any potential misconduct shown in the recordings.

Police have also launched an internal probe into how the videos were obtained from the city’s video maintenance system.

So it's not like Bridgeport is on the up-and-up all of a sudden. Or perhaps there is cabal infighting?

Secondly, this judge found that Gomes had standing, contrary to what every other judge found w/resepect to Trump.

Is this particular to Connecticut? It seems Section 9-328 is the matter at hand here. And a case they cite is Cohen vs. Rossi.

https://casetext.com/statute/general-statutes-of-connecticut/title-9-elections/chapter-149-elections-and-primaries-contested/section-9-328-contests-and-complaints-in-election-of-municipal-officers-and-nomination-of-justices-of-the-peace

https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/supreme-court/2023/sc20737.html

^ This case was from 2021 and is another mayoral race, so very recent precedent...