I don't agree with the idea that rural people will be safe from violence.
People fleeing the cities and suburbs will be heading for the sticks after things go down. They know that's where the peppers are. They know that's where the food is. They know that lower population density gives them a better chance of avoiding violence from others.
And they'll be desperate. It's not like they won't be able to find guns in the cities.
Could you explain why you think people in the cities wouldn't be able to leave the cities and come to rural areas? Because I really don't understand that reasoning.
It is a very large algorithm that is all theory and also depends on location.
Temperature plays a huge role.
All humans need water.
Cities are built on a platform of supply and demand. Even commie cities have supply and demand.
In my opinion this in cities might be better to have a week supply of water in your home and if the emp does happen and things are not corrected to at least water working within a week then leave the cities. New York City doesn’t have room for a weeks supply of water in millions of homes (closet homes).
In the cities the surge of those leaving will cause jams. Remember cars won’t work and millions don’t have cars. We seen a little when 9/11 happened but most people stayed in the city.
The -assurance- people have in the country is distance and visibility and knowing their neighbors. It takes days to walk to the country.
Ok-imagaine no autos working and no gasoline. No electricity. The water supply needs both electricity and gas. Maybe steam will still work? In the country they have wells and can manually get water.
3-days without water and hundreds of miles for millions of city people… wow. That is some unimaginable crazy. People without a society with standards will crumble within the 1st week.
In USA this has never been seen. We are the most out of shape.. not all are. We are the most addicted to medicines. Not all are. If say one hits over Chicago area… we can only speculate. I would stay home and wait.
People will rob, loot, rape, shoot, beat up. Others will panic shoot. What happens when the millions on prescription drugs that have side effects?
Cities and such are different. Even if 80 percent of the city is helping. The 20 percent doing the crazy stuff will be something.
It is all hypothetical and I am thinking more on the side that most cities and huge percentages of USA population do not have a foundation in God. Their foundation is built on a rug that could be pulled at any moment.
Very few people are able to be self reliant. We have millions of people in the hidden areas of our culture that do things to keep people able to complain about how racist someone is—these people do some very important work. Without electricity they will not be able to do it.
To liken this to the Bible. Think of locusts plague as the same as if we lost electricity for a week.
One year my neighborhood lost power for 2 weeks in the middle of the coldest winter -15 which felt like -40. We are the only home within thousands of homes that has a wood burning fireplace-free standing high efficiency one.. not a regular one. We were the only ones left in the whole neighborhood. We had water and firewood.
I'm not saying everyone is going to get out. Lots of people will die. That's obvious.
But it's a false sense of security thinking that just because someone lives out in the country they'll be safe from others looking to survive.
It's ludicrous that you think people in a life-or-death situation wouldn't do something as simple as walking or biking away from the city/suburbs because it's a little inconvenient or causes some discomfort.
Look at what illegal immigrants do to get here. Many of them walk for months to get here. They cross deserts and rivers. If you're right about Americans being too stupid and lazy to walk out of cities, then whenever the US rebuilds, it's going to be mostly people from Mexico and Central America, because they're certainly able to survive harsh situations.
Seriously, if you were visiting someone in the closest city to where you lived when it happened, would you just throw your hands up in the air and sit around, waiting to die? Or would you find a backpack, some bottled water or gatorade, and a jar of peanut butter or some other calorically dense food, steal the nearest bike, and head home?
Also, I have no idea what you mean by this:
Very few people are able to be self reliant. We have millions of people in the hidden areas of our culture that do things to keep people able to complain about how racist someone is—these people do some very important work. Without electricity they will not be able to do it.
I don't agree with the idea that rural people will be safe from violence.
People fleeing the cities and suburbs will be heading for the sticks after things go down. They know that's where the peppers are. They know that's where the food is. They know that lower population density gives them a better chance of avoiding violence from others.
And they'll be desperate. It's not like they won't be able to find guns in the cities.
Could you explain why you think people in the cities wouldn't be able to leave the cities and come to rural areas? Because I really don't understand that reasoning.
It is a very large algorithm that is all theory and also depends on location.
Temperature plays a huge role.
All humans need water.
Cities are built on a platform of supply and demand. Even commie cities have supply and demand.
In my opinion this in cities might be better to have a week supply of water in your home and if the emp does happen and things are not corrected to at least water working within a week then leave the cities. New York City doesn’t have room for a weeks supply of water in millions of homes (closet homes).
In the cities the surge of those leaving will cause jams. Remember cars won’t work and millions don’t have cars. We seen a little when 9/11 happened but most people stayed in the city.
The -assurance- people have in the country is distance and visibility and knowing their neighbors. It takes days to walk to the country.
Ok-imagaine no autos working and no gasoline. No electricity. The water supply needs both electricity and gas. Maybe steam will still work? In the country they have wells and can manually get water.
3-days without water and hundreds of miles for millions of city people… wow. That is some unimaginable crazy. People without a society with standards will crumble within the 1st week.
I don't know why you believe desperate people wouldn't /couldn't walk for a few days for a chance to survive. It's just walking.
And if people just can't seem to bring themselves to walk in order to survive, I'm sure they can figure out how bicycles work.
In USA this has never been seen. We are the most out of shape.. not all are. We are the most addicted to medicines. Not all are. If say one hits over Chicago area… we can only speculate. I would stay home and wait.
People will rob, loot, rape, shoot, beat up. Others will panic shoot. What happens when the millions on prescription drugs that have side effects?
Cities and such are different. Even if 80 percent of the city is helping. The 20 percent doing the crazy stuff will be something.
It is all hypothetical and I am thinking more on the side that most cities and huge percentages of USA population do not have a foundation in God. Their foundation is built on a rug that could be pulled at any moment.
Very few people are able to be self reliant. We have millions of people in the hidden areas of our culture that do things to keep people able to complain about how racist someone is—these people do some very important work. Without electricity they will not be able to do it.
To liken this to the Bible. Think of locusts plague as the same as if we lost electricity for a week.
One year my neighborhood lost power for 2 weeks in the middle of the coldest winter -15 which felt like -40. We are the only home within thousands of homes that has a wood burning fireplace-free standing high efficiency one.. not a regular one. We were the only ones left in the whole neighborhood. We had water and firewood.
I'm not saying everyone is going to get out. Lots of people will die. That's obvious.
But it's a false sense of security thinking that just because someone lives out in the country they'll be safe from others looking to survive.
It's ludicrous that you think people in a life-or-death situation wouldn't do something as simple as walking or biking away from the city/suburbs because it's a little inconvenient or causes some discomfort.
Look at what illegal immigrants do to get here. Many of them walk for months to get here. They cross deserts and rivers. If you're right about Americans being too stupid and lazy to walk out of cities, then whenever the US rebuilds, it's going to be mostly people from Mexico and Central America, because they're certainly able to survive harsh situations.
Seriously, if you were visiting someone in the closest city to where you lived when it happened, would you just throw your hands up in the air and sit around, waiting to die? Or would you find a backpack, some bottled water or gatorade, and a jar of peanut butter or some other calorically dense food, steal the nearest bike, and head home?
Also, I have no idea what you mean by this:
Could you clarify that for me, please?