Why is it that the countries that have been involved in direct conflict over these past few years, just happen to coincide with the countries that are tied to the fall of the Khazarian Empire?
(Ukraine) - The Khazarian Empire encompassed what is now Ukraine and parts of Eastern Europe.
Khazarians at the time were known by those living in bordering countries to generally be liars, deceivers,cons, robbers, road warriors, murderers, identity thieves and social parasites of the worst variety. And to make matters worse, their ruler did nothing to reverse this because he too was like them. They repeatedly preyed on travelers at their borders or anyone who tried to travel through Khazaria, usually a fatal mistake.
(Russia and Iran) -
Russia and Persia (Present day Iran) had repeatedly instructed Khazarian leadership that Khazaria as a nation and people had to change from its evil, inhuman ways and stop parasitizing its neighbors, or suffer complete destruction.
This ultimatum was that Khazaria as a nation had to immediately change its ways, and to do this, King Bulan must select one of the three Abrahamic religions and institute it as the official required Khazarian state religion. King Bulan was told in no uncertain terms that the religion chosen must be indoctrinated in all Khazarians to serve as rules of conduct and as a basis for integrity and ethics that were previously completely absent.
King Bulan agreed and selected Torah Judaism as Khazaria’s official religion. This worked somewhat for a while, but soon Khazarians were drifting back to their old ways of national banditry, murder and gross parasitism of others from surrounding nations.
Instead of working to establish morals and ethics in his nation by making a serious attempt to practice Torah Judaism, King Bulan and his top staff actually were inducted into the Black Arts and Black Magic of Babylonian Talmudism, better known as Baal worship or Satanism. Externally this looks a lot like Torah Judaism and can be used as false cover, which it was.
Khazaria was finally destroyed in about 1250 AD by Russia and Persia(Current day Iran) as it had been literally terrorizing, robbing, murdering and parasitizing neighbors and travelers for over 500 years.
(Israel) - 80% of Israel is owned by the Rothchilds. In fact it was Lionel Walter Rothschild who had the British Support in 1917 by decree of the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration (“Baflours promise” in Arabic) declared by Britain in 1917 statement of British support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
The Rothchild's ancestry goes back to the Khazarian Empire.
The Khazar empire had a small but powerful group of Jewish bankers in Kiev as early as the 10th century.” – The Regime: Usury, Khazaria and the American Mass, Matthew Johnson. The Rothschilds were Ashkenazi Jews, Khazarians, “they’re arguably the most influential Nephilim Hosts of the Common Era,” Sangar said, “the Rothschild family and their Khazarian mafia have gained a foothold in almost every country since the mid-1700s.”
A Nephilim host such as the Rothchilds - “Nephilim Hosts are individuals who have partnered with the spiritual forces of darkness to carry out the Nephilim agenda.” An agenda to defile the human genome through the propagation of a hybrid race, the purpose of which is to overthrow God’s Kingdom.
(Palestine) - Having secured the support of the British government for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, on May 14, 1948, as soon as the British Mandate expired, Zionist forces declared the establishment of the State of Israel, triggering the first Arab-Israeli war. (known as the Nakba) The Zionist military forces expelled at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homes and lands and captured 78 percent of historic Palestine, with the remaining 22 percent was divided into what are now the occupied West Bank and the besieged Gaza Strip.
Some other interesting details that might explain the desired ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, ties back to the Khazarians again.
Khazarians’ origin is believed to have been a hybridization between Turks and Mongols, with absolutely no genetic ties to the ancient Hebrews. It is truly interesting that these Khazarians have absolutely no ancient Hebrew Blood at all, none, although their leaders usually claim to carry ancient Hebrew Blood and to be Semites, when they are not Semites at all, and have absolutely no ancestral rights to any land in the Mideast.
About 80% of the Palestinians carry ancient Hebrew Blood and thus are true Semites, and hold an un-abandoned, absolute ancestral right to all of Palestine, despite any Khazarian claims, which are all based on lies and political intrigue.
Feel free to comment on what i shared here today. My thoughts are that the Khazarians have had a long time hate for both Russia and Persia (Present day Iran.) They still have a score to settle with the both of them. They have used the West to help finance their retaliation war against Russia, and are now pushing the notion that it is Iran, who is responsible for the recent attacks made by Hamas. This is obviously setting the stage up for the Khazarians retaliation war against Iran.
This doesnt surprise me though. When you look at Biden's executive branch, it is full of Askenazi/Khazarian Jews. (Blinken, Yellen, Garland, Nuland) These individuals have bent over backwards to ensure that Ukraine was supported against Russia, and now that Israel will be supported against Iran.
The Palestinians on the other hand must be eliminated as they hold Hebrew blood and are the true Semites. This makes them a threat to the Khazarian wanna be Jews.
https://geopolitics.co/2017/09/08/khazarians-then-khazarians-now/
A person can be "jewish" by converting to the religion of Judaism. But MOST of the people we refer to as "jew" or "jewish" are of the ethnic variety, whether religious or not so much.
The fact that it can also be used as a "pajorative for approbrious behavior," is merely due to the fact that this is how so many of them behave, and have done so for many, many centuries. Not ALL blacks are looters; but MOST looters are black. Same concept for jews and their nasty behavior through the centuries.
No. These are the Latin and Greek terms that were used during the time of Christ to describe the residents of Judea, which by that time was no longer the Kingdom of Judah, but was now the Roman province of Judea. The "jews" (not called that back then) were living in Judea and CLAIMING to be genetic decendents of Jacob/Israel (i.e. Israelites, of the covenant), but LIED ABOUT IT because THEY WERE NOT the Israelites.
Jesus confronted these people many times, and called them out:
Not exactly. Communism was created by jews, as the antithesis to the jewish Illuminati, so they could do the old "Problem > Reaction > Solution." Also known as "Order out of Chaos," which is EXACTLY what we are witnessing today in the 21st Century.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twEWYTvX3lQ
True. Germany was next on the jewish checklist, after the overthrow of Russia.
The jewish plan was to take over all of Europe, and then the world. Hitler stopped Stalin from a full-on European invasion:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OM1UlLkQQfZv/
And that would have been extremely brutal for all of Europe:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vi3dyEySSt6t/
https://archive.org/details/ImpartialTruth
Are you carefully listening to what these people say themselves?
Of course, you can continue to belief, whatever you want. And you can continue to try to convince everyone of your point of view. Listen to what THEY say.
And you will find, you are wrong. You need to let go, and listen carefully.
Don't be vague.
Spell it out.
What did that rabbi say as a name for what you call Jews ..... He uses 3 terms. All with different meaning. Listen very carefully. He uses the term: Yehudim.
This is also the term used in Arabic.
Then, please, read my post here: https://archive.searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3465100
Still not clear.
What I will say is this:
When we are talking about language, and especially many languages, it gets tricky.
The original books of the Old Testament were written in Hebrew. The New Testament in Greek.
None of it was written in English, which did not exist.
There is no "j" in Hebrew or Greek. When Wycliff did the first translation into English, in the year 1345, the world "jew" did not exist.
Originally, he wrote "gyu," and this evolved over many translations into "jew" (same pronunciation as gyu). He had to make it up because it was the first syllable of the sound of the Hebrew and Greek words used for the residents of Judea.
By the time of Christ, there was no more Kingdom of Israel or Kingdom of Judah. It was the Roman Empire province of Judea. The people living there were of several different ethnicities. It was a "diverse" culture. It was no longer only the Israelites.
The word "jew" was used in the English versions of the Bible to describe SOME of these people living in Judea.
They were the people who were NOT of Israelite blood, but who were claiming to be. Jesus knew who was who, and who was a fake. He called them out for their lies ("hypocrisy").
Beyond that, I don't care what this rabbi does or does not have to say about it.