Why is it that the countries that have been involved in direct conflict over these past few years, just happen to coincide with the countries that are tied to the fall of the Khazarian Empire?
(Ukraine) - The Khazarian Empire encompassed what is now Ukraine and parts of Eastern Europe.
Khazarians at the time were known by those living in bordering countries to generally be liars, deceivers,cons, robbers, road warriors, murderers, identity thieves and social parasites of the worst variety. And to make matters worse, their ruler did nothing to reverse this because he too was like them. They repeatedly preyed on travelers at their borders or anyone who tried to travel through Khazaria, usually a fatal mistake.
(Russia and Iran) -
Russia and Persia (Present day Iran) had repeatedly instructed Khazarian leadership that Khazaria as a nation and people had to change from its evil, inhuman ways and stop parasitizing its neighbors, or suffer complete destruction.
This ultimatum was that Khazaria as a nation had to immediately change its ways, and to do this, King Bulan must select one of the three Abrahamic religions and institute it as the official required Khazarian state religion. King Bulan was told in no uncertain terms that the religion chosen must be indoctrinated in all Khazarians to serve as rules of conduct and as a basis for integrity and ethics that were previously completely absent.
King Bulan agreed and selected Torah Judaism as Khazaria’s official religion. This worked somewhat for a while, but soon Khazarians were drifting back to their old ways of national banditry, murder and gross parasitism of others from surrounding nations.
Instead of working to establish morals and ethics in his nation by making a serious attempt to practice Torah Judaism, King Bulan and his top staff actually were inducted into the Black Arts and Black Magic of Babylonian Talmudism, better known as Baal worship or Satanism. Externally this looks a lot like Torah Judaism and can be used as false cover, which it was.
Khazaria was finally destroyed in about 1250 AD by Russia and Persia(Current day Iran) as it had been literally terrorizing, robbing, murdering and parasitizing neighbors and travelers for over 500 years.
(Israel) - 80% of Israel is owned by the Rothchilds. In fact it was Lionel Walter Rothschild who had the British Support in 1917 by decree of the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration (“Baflours promise” in Arabic) declared by Britain in 1917 statement of British support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
The Rothchild's ancestry goes back to the Khazarian Empire.
The Khazar empire had a small but powerful group of Jewish bankers in Kiev as early as the 10th century.” – The Regime: Usury, Khazaria and the American Mass, Matthew Johnson. The Rothschilds were Ashkenazi Jews, Khazarians, “they’re arguably the most influential Nephilim Hosts of the Common Era,” Sangar said, “the Rothschild family and their Khazarian mafia have gained a foothold in almost every country since the mid-1700s.”
A Nephilim host such as the Rothchilds - “Nephilim Hosts are individuals who have partnered with the spiritual forces of darkness to carry out the Nephilim agenda.” An agenda to defile the human genome through the propagation of a hybrid race, the purpose of which is to overthrow God’s Kingdom.
(Palestine) - Having secured the support of the British government for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, on May 14, 1948, as soon as the British Mandate expired, Zionist forces declared the establishment of the State of Israel, triggering the first Arab-Israeli war. (known as the Nakba) The Zionist military forces expelled at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homes and lands and captured 78 percent of historic Palestine, with the remaining 22 percent was divided into what are now the occupied West Bank and the besieged Gaza Strip.
Some other interesting details that might explain the desired ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, ties back to the Khazarians again.
Khazarians’ origin is believed to have been a hybridization between Turks and Mongols, with absolutely no genetic ties to the ancient Hebrews. It is truly interesting that these Khazarians have absolutely no ancient Hebrew Blood at all, none, although their leaders usually claim to carry ancient Hebrew Blood and to be Semites, when they are not Semites at all, and have absolutely no ancestral rights to any land in the Mideast.
About 80% of the Palestinians carry ancient Hebrew Blood and thus are true Semites, and hold an un-abandoned, absolute ancestral right to all of Palestine, despite any Khazarian claims, which are all based on lies and political intrigue.
Feel free to comment on what i shared here today. My thoughts are that the Khazarians have had a long time hate for both Russia and Persia (Present day Iran.) They still have a score to settle with the both of them. They have used the West to help finance their retaliation war against Russia, and are now pushing the notion that it is Iran, who is responsible for the recent attacks made by Hamas. This is obviously setting the stage up for the Khazarians retaliation war against Iran.
This doesnt surprise me though. When you look at Biden's executive branch, it is full of Askenazi/Khazarian Jews. (Blinken, Yellen, Garland, Nuland) These individuals have bent over backwards to ensure that Ukraine was supported against Russia, and now that Israel will be supported against Iran.
The Palestinians on the other hand must be eliminated as they hold Hebrew blood and are the true Semites. This makes them a threat to the Khazarian wanna be Jews.
https://geopolitics.co/2017/09/08/khazarians-then-khazarians-now/
"Judeo-Christian" pastors are often mis-directed by commentarties of the likes of CI Scofield who was bankrolled by KM's to write the editorial commentary in the marginal notes of Scriptures, marketed among seminarians as the Scofield Reference Bible. Oxford Press who publishes it is KM owned/operated.
"The jews themselves state in their Jewish Encyclopedia... " "Jews" don't say anything. KM's write the narrative for "jews" even as they attempt to write it for Christians, and some Christians have fallen for it, I agree with you. KM's are inventing their own narrative which complement's Scofield's. There is not a jew today who can trace his lineage back to any one of the origianal tribe's of Judah or the Northern Kingdom.
If KM's tell me that Edomites and Canaanites became jews that is only to further their narrative absent having any traceability of anyone - and least of all KM's -- to true Hebrew roots.
Just because a ZIonist may speak Hebrew does not make him a Hebrew.
Generally, I agree.
I only mentioned the Jewish Encyclopedia stating that "Edomites are in modern jewry" because EVEN THEY say it is so.
Not that I take their info to be any sort of authority, but they want the world to think they are "God's chosen people" (i.e. Israelites), all the while they admit they are Edomites (not Israelites).
Just shows that EVEN THEY know they lie about the whole thing.
The Bible traces with great detail the genetic line of the Israelites (This man begat that son, who begat that son, etc.). This is BECAUSE the Bible is a book ABOUT the Israelite people FOR the Israelite people.
It also includes SOME genetic history of other people who interacted with the Israelites, but all of that is secondary, so those other genetic lines are not detailed.
But the Israelites are:
God >> Adam >> Seth ... >> Noah >> Shem >> ... Abraham >> Isaac >> Jacob/Israel >> 12 Tribes (Israelites), including Judah >> ... Virgin Mary >> Jesus/God.
The Edomites came from Isaac >> Esau/Edom. The Canaanites came from Noah >> Ham >> Caanan.
We know that PARTS of the Israelite family tree mixed with these other people (which was a sin), and were from that point on NO LONGER Israelite people, because those parts of the family tree were no longer pure Israelite.
But we don't have a detailed history of it, because the Bible is not primarily about them.
If the true Israelites were offspring of Jacob, and were not allowed to marry outside the family, wouldn't they become inbred? I suspect there is a lot of mixing of groups in this area, just as there was around Ukraine. Who can really lay claim to any land after it has been conquered and re-conquered numerous times? Where is our homeland if American belongs to the Indians? What if our heritage came from numerous places? Why can't we just belong where we are?