Sure, investigation is fine, but I'm hardly seeing any actual proof of fraud here. Like, how can we tell the difference between fraud and when we genuinely lose an election? Every election will have peculiarities, but that doesn't nessesarily mean fraud.
To add, we also can't just demand investigations for every election we lose or people will just think we're the boy who cried wolf; and we likely would be.
We have to find the right balance of evidence to call for an investigation and to call an outcome fraudulent. Too little and no one will listen. But if the amount of evidence people want before investigating is too much, we won't be able to muster up enough evidence without an investigation, which would leave us stuck.
Sure, investigation is fine, but I'm hardly seeing any actual proof of fraud here. Like, how can we tell the difference between fraud and when we genuinely lose an election? Every election will have peculiarities, but that doesn't nessesarily mean fraud.
Certainly.
To add, we also can't just demand investigations for every election we lose or people will just think we're the boy who cried wolf; and we likely would be.
We have to find the right balance of evidence to call for an investigation and to call an outcome fraudulent. Too little and no one will listen. But if the amount of evidence people want before investigating is too much, we won't be able to muster up enough evidence without an investigation, which would leave us stuck.