They’ve done this pretty much in the Uk since Blair brought in the children’s act. “Child protection” is run by SJWs but all enforcement is so subjective dependent on the opinions of “professionals” that they can justify pretty much anything if they want grounds to remove kids. They can always find “evidence” and are expert in wording things ambiguously to imply negative connotations. Then once one “professional” says something no other “professional” will run the risk of disagreeing in case the future shows they got it wrong. They all cover their ass and children suffer. I’ve seen it happen more times than I could suffer so I stopped working in that arena
They’ve done this pretty much in the Uk since Blair brought in the children’s act. “Child protection” is run by SJWs but all enforcement is so subjective dependent on the opinions of “professionals” that they can justify pretty much anything if they want grounds to remove kids. They can always find “evidence” and are expert in wording things ambiguously to imply negative connotations. Then once one “professional” says something no other “professional” will run the risk of disagreeing in case the future shows they got it wrong. They all cover their ass and children suffer. I’ve seen it happen more times than I could suffer so I stopped working in that arena