This week we saw the leak of the Nashville Manifesto, a document that devestated the M5M media narrative. Today, we see this story rising on X and being pushed by the M5M. Be very careful with this story! I sense a psy-op in the making to reignite old narratives. This seems way too convenient!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You clearly don't know what you are talking about, because (1) there wouldn't be visible smoke (the discharge departed the muzzle at the rate of 1000 feet/second), (2) you can't tell the difference between relaxed or unrelaxed, but good technique requires being relaxed, (3) the shooter was point-shooting (not using sights) which is typical at close range if one is practiced with the weapon used, (4) brass is seen clearly in photography as a commonplace (read gun magazines to see examples), (5) with respect to timing, the slide has completed its cycle and is ready for the next shot (yes, it is damn near instantaneous), and (6) you don't know how many shots the cameraman took that were crummy, if he had a motorized shutter (there was a famous World War II photographer who explained that his technique was to simply take copious amounts of photos and sort them out afterward to find the choice shots); it also happens that people are in the right place at the right time. Being in the right place at the right time is NOT an impossibility. (The flip side, of course, was that the victim was in the wrong place at the wrong time.)
Really a joke for you to say anything was fake, when you are unfamiliar with the subject.
And you are so full of name-calling, but not one iota of refutation. The bullet is propelled from the pistol at a typical speed (for 9mm) of 1000 fps. It can't do that unless the gas behind it is also moving at the same speed, at high pressure. Once the bullet leaves the muzzle, the high-pressure gas actually expands and increases its velocity, but dissipates after traveling several feet.. I've read articles in the shooting press on the use of Schlieren photography to visualize the density field around the bullet, to draw conclusions about whether a boat-tailed bullet or a flat-based bullet will be affected by this expansion cloud behind it. (In my opinion, interpreting the photos, I didn't think their experimental setup was exact enough to draw any conclusions. Understanding Schlieren photographs is part of my training as an aerodynamicist.)
I've already mentioned I have fired at least 8 major pistol calibers, repeatedly, or at least enough to have preferences. I've fired semi-automatic pistols and revolvers, double-action and single-action triggers. You don't mention if you have even fired a .22. (Of course, if that's all you've fired, I would be embarrassed to say so.)
I don't know what that acronym means, but if you try to pronounce it, don't trip on your way down the stairs.