This week we saw the leak of the Nashville Manifesto, a document that devestated the M5M media narrative. Today, we see this story rising on X and being pushed by the M5M. Be very careful with this story! I sense a psy-op in the making to reignite old narratives. This seems way too convenient!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (84)
sorted by:
Serious question here. Should the slide be back into firing position with the operator's hand relaxed with the spent casing so close to the weapon? Methinks not. No visible smoke, either. Not to mention every video that I've found with a quick search DOES NOT show him firing the weapon or the still image shown here. Just him waving the gun about and a shot of the body in the road. 🤔
I'm not seeing the relaxation everyone is mentioning; but it's moot because the COMPLETE lack of smoke and the gun's position showing no hint of being in recoil, even with a one-handed grip and the casing still right there, are sus AF.
Visible smoke not a possibility. First, it is called smokeless powder for a reason. Second, it is being ejected from the barrel at the speed of the bullet (~1000 feet per second), or even faster from rapid expansion. The case is moving much slower than the bullet. When shooting, it is common to be aware of the case motion (sometimes it hits you in the forehead). I have seldom been aware of smoke from an immediate shot.
You have an imaginary conception of what the proper shooting stance should be, and there is nothing about his stance that is contrary to proper shooting posture. Relaxed is a good way to be. Being tensed up leads to a poor shot.
The cameraman was lucky to get the shot, but being lucky does not mean impossible.
DRD chimes in, verifying that its a psyop
This fits very well in here: https://rumble.com/v3uri4d-stone-temple-pilots-big-bang-baby.html
Oh, I have an acronym. I hadn't known. But you guys all respond to reality through your own paranoia. So, in an ironic way, it is a "psyop"...for you.
Moreover the pistol is in full battery, no trace of movement on the slide. It still should be moving given the location of the casing. Also there is no sign of recoil induced hand movement or barrel rise.
The pistol has completed its ejection cycle and is BACK in battery. The shell casing didn't get in mid air all by itself; it was ejected. There can never be a "trace of movement on the slide" when being in battery, which is stationary. The flight of the casing is SLOW compared to slide movement in action. With good technique, there should be no sign of "recoil induced hand movement." There is only barrel rise with muzzle flip, but that would be visible in this photo only if the shooter "limp-wristed" the shot, which is easy to prevent. The usual way of absorbing such motions is for the forearm as a whole to rise, and there is no way of telling whether it did or not.
Lots of photos of ejected shells in the gun magazines. I've never seen a blurred one. The camera is fast enough to capture that.
Its almost like you are an expert on everything!
You clearly don't know what you are talking about, because (1) there wouldn't be visible smoke (the discharge departed the muzzle at the rate of 1000 feet/second), (2) you can't tell the difference between relaxed or unrelaxed, but good technique requires being relaxed, (3) the shooter was point-shooting (not using sights) which is typical at close range if one is practiced with the weapon used, (4) brass is seen clearly in photography as a commonplace (read gun magazines to see examples), (5) with respect to timing, the slide has completed its cycle and is ready for the next shot (yes, it is damn near instantaneous), and (6) you don't know how many shots the cameraman took that were crummy, if he had a motorized shutter (there was a famous World War II photographer who explained that his technique was to simply take copious amounts of photos and sort them out afterward to find the choice shots); it also happens that people are in the right place at the right time. Being in the right place at the right time is NOT an impossibility. (The flip side, of course, was that the victim was in the wrong place at the wrong time.)
Really a joke for you to say anything was fake, when you are unfamiliar with the subject.
And you are so full of name-calling, but not one iota of refutation. The bullet is propelled from the pistol at a typical speed (for 9mm) of 1000 fps. It can't do that unless the gas behind it is also moving at the same speed, at high pressure. Once the bullet leaves the muzzle, the high-pressure gas actually expands and increases its velocity, but dissipates after traveling several feet.. I've read articles in the shooting press on the use of Schlieren photography to visualize the density field around the bullet, to draw conclusions about whether a boat-tailed bullet or a flat-based bullet will be affected by this expansion cloud behind it. (In my opinion, interpreting the photos, I didn't think their experimental setup was exact enough to draw any conclusions. Understanding Schlieren photographs is part of my training as an aerodynamicist.)
I've already mentioned I have fired at least 8 major pistol calibers, repeatedly, or at least enough to have preferences. I've fired semi-automatic pistols and revolvers, double-action and single-action triggers. You don't mention if you have even fired a .22. (Of course, if that's all you've fired, I would be embarrassed to say so.)
I don't know what that acronym means, but if you try to pronounce it, don't trip on your way down the stairs.
I do see what looks to be faint smoke just above the gun, although that would be VERY easy to Photoshop into the picture. If the picture was actually taken the moment the round is ejecting, you would expect there to be more smoke in front of the barrel of the gun. I can't say there is no smoke in the picture, but it sure doesn't look very realistic.
Just above the gun is totally clear. The background is blurry, but that is because it is out of focus.
The action of a semi-automatic pistol is FAST. Just because the camera did not catch it does not mean it did not happen. And there is no way the case could have been ejected without the action of the slide. There is no indication the operator's hand is "relaxed." It looks to have a firm grip on the weapon, which is all you need. The reason modern gunpowder is called "smokeless powder" is because (wait for it) there is little visible smoke. And what there might have been would have been blown out of the camera field of view. And just because you couldn't find this photo means only---that you couldn't find this photo.
I've shot pistols of all kinds over the years. Don't go down the imaginary trail of things you don't know about.
I appreciate it when you give us your 2 cents.
Your absurd explanations help me know we are on the right track, and directly over the target.
If they are absurd, surely you would have the means to explain why...
If you can’t see it, i cant help you see it.
Various 9mm, .38 Super, .40 S&W, .45 Auto, 10mm, 7.62x25mm Tokarev, .38 Special. .357 Magnum. Double-action & single-action. Double-stack & single-stack. Semi-auto & revolver. I find it curious that I can state something that is simply true and someone like you finds it necessary to call me a liar.
No visible smoke. it seems to me you haven't done any shooting or have seen any pistols actually being fired. Under the right circumstances you might be able to see a bit of flame at the muzzle, but that is usually in night conditions.
The brass shell didn't get up in the air because pixies carried it. That is the typical trajectory of an ejected shell...and it doesn't happen unless the shell is ejected...which doesn't happen unless the gun is fired. You simply have no idea how fast all this action is. If the muzzle velocity is ~1000 fps and the barrel length is ~4 inches, the transit time is something like 0.3 milliseconds. Is that a typical camera speed?
NSFW link, vid of killing the activist:
https://twitter.com/BlueyAnon/status/1722413325638840413
Just putting this here, the guy didn't look like he was threatened. If he was a lawyer, maybe he knows something about their laws that we don't.
I don't glorify killing others. Everything I have studied about Jesus & his potential to visit other sheep shows that he has zero desire for us to make war/she'd blood of our fellow man. We are justified in self defense IMO, though I can't say this was self defense.
edit: https://files.catbox.moe/zafsdo.mp4
"x" now says that does not exist...
https://files.catbox.moe/zafsdo.mp4
It's clear you have not been trained to shoot. You do so with a relaxed hand, though with a grip firm enough to keep the pistol under control. What do you expect to see? A clenched fist? Impossible to shoot straight. Bulging arteries? Get serious. And yes, the slide operates VERY FAST. When shooting, it is so fast you only notice the instant of recoil and the pistol can shoot again as quickly as you can pull the trigger. There is generally no visible smoke ("smokeless" powder, remember?).