Nope, no, not, never. This dude is not pope, never was.
Given that, the Brazilian bishops asked for clarification. And the clarification might not be wrong, not being a new doctrine but a review of existing practice. If a tranny is trying to get saved, behind Catholic, then why not get baptized? The other point of clarification was whether a child of a homosexual couple can be baptized- on the theological point of whether the child will be brought up Catholic, if there is good faith it will, then baptism should be fine. But there are practical, real concerns- evil people love to have power over baptized children and have access to the consecrated Host, to desecrate them (this has been a thing forever but not covered in the media); homosexual couples are already not right with God and can take this as validation of their lifestyle from the church; dilution of standards takes everyone down.
Nope, no, not, never. This dude is not pope, never was.
Given that, the Brazilian bishops asked for clarification. And the clarification might not be wrong, not being a new doctrine but a review of existing practice. If a tranny is trying to get saved, behind Catholic, then why not get baptized? The other point of clarification was whether a child of a homosexual couple can be baptized- on the theological point of whether the child will be brought up Catholic, if there is good faith it will, then baptism should be fine. But there are practical, real concerns- evil people love to have power over baptized children and have access to the consecrated Host, to desecrate them (this has been a thing forever but not covered in the media); homosexual couples are already not right with God and can take this as validation of their lifestyle from the church; dilution of standards takes everyone down.