11.09 - BREAKING: AP, Reuters, NYT, CNN coordinated Israel attack.
(www.i24news.tv)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
The simplest hypothesis is that Hamas reached out and "recruited" sympathetic freelance photographers in advance, and had them in place, pending the date of the actual operation, when they were infiltrated into the battle scenes. Then the photographers sold their coverage to the highest---or most agreeable---bidder. Modern news media have long ago sold their souls for access to on-the-scene coverage early in the news cycle.
No, the simplest hypothesis is Israel, who created Hamas, wanted international news coverage of the attack spread far and wide, to gain sympathy, to gain monetary support from the USA and to justify the premeditated ethnic cleansing.
Edit: You always enter the conversation as controlled opposition. Given your account name, what do you know about Lahaina?
You talk about motives, not about how what took place happened. I still think the Hamas-photographers handshake is the simplest. I have seen other news that the photographers were simply Hamas to begin with. Right now, it is redounding to the support of Hamas, as reflected by the startling degree of popular support.
No, I enter the conversation as someone not brainwashed by a preconceived narrative. You have worked yourself into the typical paranoic pose that anyone who is not with you is against you. As regards Lahaina, I consider the idea of space lasers to be absolutely nuts. Quite aside from the technical likelihood (zero), it is absurd to think that advanced technology was something that needed to be used instead of a kitchen match or cigarette lighter. On other points, melted aluminum wheels have been found in other runaway forest fires. (All four wheels being melted would be inconsistent with a laser that can fire from only one direction.) And roofs of all colors were either burnt or not. (I think most blue roofs were of homes that were nowhere near the fire.)
What happened was the ultra secure border was disabled and IDF was moved from the area, opening a gateway for the attack, which means it was a false flag attack, thus giving justification for the response, kill everything, expanding their property lines.
I'm not sure if you caught the video of Ron Paul saying Israel created Hamas to counter the PLO. If not look it up, you can find it on this site by searching Ron Paul. Israel has been using Hanas attacks as a reason to spread their land grab for many years. The MSM being in place during the attack to spread the attack coverage was intentional to gain support among the Epstein blackmailed politicians and force monetary support. You see, Ukraine funding is gone, drug and child trafficking money is gone, Rothchild support is gone, Israel has no income at the moment. Monetary support from the USA was critical. However, this is another clue for everyone watching, it points out every politician under Mossad control.
Yes, Trump is supporting Israel but that is his only option temporarily. I think the mass deportation that Trump speaks of may happen sooner than expected. All we need is a Hamas terrorist attack here in the USA and deportation of every Hamas affiliated illegal alien can begin. Once it is realized, Israel who is saved for last, was the mastermind behind everything, who controlled our media, then the second wave of deportations and arrests can begin.
I was only digressing in a humorous way that you had any affiliation to the Hawaii event. However, for you to deny the technology exists is kinda self revealing. Look up Rods of God, you can find videos out of Israel. Trump just gave a speech talking about it. To say that technology can't be placed on a satellite or a plane exposes your true motivation. Controlled opposition.
Your entire line of logic hinges on the question of why and how the IDF was caught napping, which has yet to be determined. Meanwhile, what are you saying? That Israel should be recumbent before unparalleled terrorist attacks? It is precisely like saying, upon the Pearl Harbor attack, that we should just suck it up. The culpability of that one was suspected long ago. My father, who fought in World War II (antisubmarine warfare in the Atlantic Ocean before the war was even declared) told me that it was generally suspected that FDR had provoked the Japanese to an incident---but that they figured it would be only the Philippines, not including Hawaii. So, yes, I know all about sinister turns of policy, but in this case it changes very little. Hamas are murdering mad dogs and Israel needs to wipe them out. If somebody is culpable in releasing mad dogs, they need to be tried for treason.
As to my bona fides, part of my career was designing laser weapons, as I have stated repeatedly. The "technology" has been around for half a century. But there are no satellites with ground-facing laser weapons. They turned out to be too big and essentially impossible to deploy. Using them on ground targets was a non-starter, as they were entirely unreliable for that purpose. (The beam would be blocked by clouds or smoke.) That was back in the 1980s. I wrote the proposal for YAL-1A, the only laser weapon mounted on an airplane and demonstrated successfully (now scrapped). Compared to me, you know zero.
"Rods of God" are only science fiction devices. They would be ineffective and they were not developed any further than Jerry Pournelle's idea. (No process for turning kinetic energy into an explosion. They would simply penetrate into the ground, like penetrating tank shells.) Very nasty hazard once their orbit decayed and they came down unguided. I looked for what you referenced but only had hits that were totally off target, or went to speculatory articles. Easy to tell when someone has no clue, as they often show the weapon being boosted in the direction of orbit. If that were the case, they would go into higher orbit and never hit the ground. In order to hit the ground, they would need to be decelerated backward, opposite to the direction the "rod" is pointing. Orbital mechanics. Not for wannabees.
To say that technology was used that would never have been required and not available, costing major expense if it had been, and referring to imaginary weapons exposes your ignorance and your motivation: myth making.