11.09 - BREAKING: AP, Reuters, NYT, CNN coordinated Israel attack.
(www.i24news.tv)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Your entire line of logic hinges on the question of why and how the IDF was caught napping, which has yet to be determined. Meanwhile, what are you saying? That Israel should be recumbent before unparalleled terrorist attacks? It is precisely like saying, upon the Pearl Harbor attack, that we should just suck it up. The culpability of that one was suspected long ago. My father, who fought in World War II (antisubmarine warfare in the Atlantic Ocean before the war was even declared) told me that it was generally suspected that FDR had provoked the Japanese to an incident---but that they figured it would be only the Philippines, not including Hawaii. So, yes, I know all about sinister turns of policy, but in this case it changes very little. Hamas are murdering mad dogs and Israel needs to wipe them out. If somebody is culpable in releasing mad dogs, they need to be tried for treason.
As to my bona fides, part of my career was designing laser weapons, as I have stated repeatedly. The "technology" has been around for half a century. But there are no satellites with ground-facing laser weapons. They turned out to be too big and essentially impossible to deploy. Using them on ground targets was a non-starter, as they were entirely unreliable for that purpose. (The beam would be blocked by clouds or smoke.) That was back in the 1980s. I wrote the proposal for YAL-1A, the only laser weapon mounted on an airplane and demonstrated successfully (now scrapped). Compared to me, you know zero.
"Rods of God" are only science fiction devices. They would be ineffective and they were not developed any further than Jerry Pournelle's idea. (No process for turning kinetic energy into an explosion. They would simply penetrate into the ground, like penetrating tank shells.) Very nasty hazard once their orbit decayed and they came down unguided. I looked for what you referenced but only had hits that were totally off target, or went to speculatory articles. Easy to tell when someone has no clue, as they often show the weapon being boosted in the direction of orbit. If that were the case, they would go into higher orbit and never hit the ground. In order to hit the ground, they would need to be decelerated backward, opposite to the direction the "rod" is pointing. Orbital mechanics. Not for wannabees.
To say that technology was used that would never have been required and not available, costing major expense if it had been, and referring to imaginary weapons exposes your ignorance and your motivation: myth making.
You love to idolize yourself, you know that is a sin, correct? You also lie which is also a sin. I notice most of your comments are always in the negative digits because no one is buying your garbage.
Here is a video talking about laser weapons. It is often said, the technology released to the public is 50 years behind what they have in hiding.
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1713623115337752592
Check the video from Israel recently, scroll down to see it.
https://twitter.com/ShadowDefense2/status/1713440760622698602
This is old news. I have repeatedly made the point that ground- and ship-based units at this power level are in trials. Israel has had to advance that schedule. Our versions have been available for perhaps 5 years.
"It is often said" is generally bullshit. Not said by anyone who knows anything. The technology for this has been public since it was demonstrated at the laboratory level. In the late 1970s, I watched video of a comparable laser weapon drill a melted hole into a tethered, hovering helicopter. Maybe not in the newspapers, but also not classified, and usually available as news from publications like Aviation Week & Space Technology. (So much so, that in the industry, it is often nicknamed "Aviation Leak.")
The only embarrassment here is that you are simply failing to pay attention. I'm trying to educate you, and you just spit it up.
First you say the technology doesn't exist, then you say we have had the same technology for 5 years, perhaps the 1970's. You act as though the technology we have is different from Israeli technology. You fail to realize that the Epstein honeypot blackmail scenario gives Israel leverage to acquire any technology that exists. Your total existence on this site is centered around opposition to every theory that makes the deep state look bad, who is paying you?
Your site name symbolizes some extreme knowledge, your negative feedback fits the name. You pat yourself of the back, demean everyone you speak with. You think you are the only person here with an objective opinion and act as though everything you speak is set in stone. This exposes the controlled opposition narrative, who pays you?
I've never said "the technology doesn't exist." I have pointed out that space lasers don't exist. I have never said or suggested that our technology is different from the Israeli technology (all light bulbs work the same way, to use a prosaic example), though it may not be precisely identical (many different light bulb designs). It is not secret technology, insofar as the science is concerned. It is a matter of workmanship. Unless you have a system in hand for dissection and copying, you have to make it yourself. Russia and China are similarly occupied.
I oppose only sheer ignorance, which is here in abundance, along with rejection of any actual expertise. I'm not being paid a cent by anyone. Want to pay me to shut up?
My site name is simply a literal fact. Originally, I thought it to be a bit of humor (ironic that it would be true). I have been involved in laser weapon design, proposal, and analysis over a span of 30 years. You guys haven't, and it shows. I don't have time to waste patting myself on the back, and my arms aren't made for it. But I do adhere to the old Texas saying: "It ain't bragging if you can prove it." You simply don't like credentials or experience. As for demeaning, if I had a dime for every curse, insult, or name thrown at me from the noble gentlemen of this site, I would be a rich man. I limit my harshness to telling people they are ignorant---when they are. Even now, you accuse me of being a paid shill---entirely out of your own imagination. In my world, 2 + 2 = 4, and I have no need to apologize for it. (In recent talk about the assassination in Panama, some commenter---in total certainty---identified the assassin's pistol as a Sig 226. So I looked up images for a Sig 226. No possible way that pistol was a Sig 226, or a 225; the physical characteristics are distinctive.. The confident person never bothered to confirm his hunch and just hung himself out to dry. Everyone gave him a pass.)
Here's a chilling thought: Suppose the "controlled opposition narrative" is actually the truth? How would you ever know? You start out with an assumption that it is a lie, and then evolve further imaginary lies to "explain" questions resulting largely from your own ignorance and prejudice. From this, it is only a step to "fringe conspiracies," which are forbidden on this sight, but which are indulged in like public drunkenness.