That's a good way to put it

Here's what she said

Stefanik said in the letter to accompany the complaint that Engoron had illegally gagged Trump’s protected political speech, violated political giving rules with financial contributions to Democrats as recently as 2018, and ignored a decision on the appropriate statute of limitations in the case. At the start of the trial, Engoron “infamously smiled and posed for the cameras,” she noted.

I don't think this has juice whatsoever.

The ignoring a decision thing I think is objectively false. The Appeals court ruled on this and said the judge had the power to decide this. Either way even if he is wrong, it's an issue for appeal, not a cause for removal.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-187b7656ac451d4275ced48bb92e03a8

This just feels like a defense brief.