I disagree with your legacy news sounding talking points. I'm not buying your talking points You keep ignoring the most important points made in my last two posts. How come? Then you repeat your legacy news sounding talking points. General Paetraeus does not have the authority the president has. Apple and oranges. .
I don't believe you did "address the main legal issues". You seemed to have repeated CNN's version of the news. So you want the complicated version or the simple version? You completely ignored the important points I made. This is the simple version. I disagree with you. That's simple enough, no?
I disagree with your legacy news sounding talking points. I'm not buying your talking points You keep ignoring the most important points made in my last two posts. How come? Then you repeat your legacy news sounding talking points. General Paetraeus does not have the authority the president has. Apple and oranges. .
This is not helpful. I linked to a lot of primary sources. If you think I got facts wrong, point them out.
Which points are these?
I think I addressed the main legal issues. And I explained which issues don't apply.
I don't believe you did "address the main legal issues". You seemed to have repeated CNN's version of the news. So you want the complicated version or the simple version? You completely ignored the important points I made. This is the simple version. I disagree with you. That's simple enough, no?
Again this is what I was asking about. What did I ignore?.. if you want me to address them, let me know what they are.
I suspect it's the part you disagree with.