Love this comment. I actually really miss having more articles and discussions like this one on GAW. A while back it seemed like we were allowed to have more “conspiracy” conversations. I always valued them here on this platform because it’s a great community of people who can reason together and agree to disagree.
Yes well it appeared that I was not forceful enough in my denial, as the ban was accompanied with the comment that there was no place for conspiracy nuts in this place, when my reply was simply one of a non-committal nature.
So, in my opinion, these stinky bait posts are meant to reveal the peeps who might want to discuss the subject, to the ban-discretion of that mod. But, one must bow to that discretion as stated in the rules, and not grief the mods. Fine, but then I wonder why they leave stinky bait up.
Are you going to ban me now, for talking about that which must not be mentioned?
Hmmm. Stinky bait.
I was banned from this place for replying to a thread such as this, for actually saying just Hmmm.
So, for the stinky mod (not the mods that reversed the decision), please note:
HMMMMMMM.
Love this comment. I actually really miss having more articles and discussions like this one on GAW. A while back it seemed like we were allowed to have more “conspiracy” conversations. I always valued them here on this platform because it’s a great community of people who can reason together and agree to disagree.
Hmmmmmm!
Yes well it appeared that I was not forceful enough in my denial, as the ban was accompanied with the comment that there was no place for conspiracy nuts in this place, when my reply was simply one of a non-committal nature.
So, in my opinion, these stinky bait posts are meant to reveal the peeps who might want to discuss the subject, to the ban-discretion of that mod. But, one must bow to that discretion as stated in the rules, and not grief the mods. Fine, but then I wonder why they leave stinky bait up.
Are you going to ban me now, for talking about that which must not be mentioned?