I don’t know why, but this guy’s testimony seems way more believable than any of the recent UFO stuff to hit congress lately. This guy comes across as intelligent and informed whereas some of the other’s have seemed ‘off’???
One of the names mentioned is Vannevar Bush.
Vannevar was a mentor to John G. Trump and was, I believe, hand picked by Vannevar to review Tesla’s papers.
I don’t have my sauce for that or I’d link it. You might find more on bitchute.
Could you explain why this is more believable than the pentagon and mil-intel officials who have testified in front of congress? Those people have well-documented, unimpeachable backgrounds.
Would be very curious to hear you elaborate on your first sentence.
Hard to explain further than I did. I have watched a couple of the testimonies (not tooooo closely) and something just seemed ‘off’ about the personnel and what they were saying. My gut feel on this guy was that he was at least a little more informed and fourth-right as a speaker.
Aside but related:
Why would the most evil and technologically advanced of this world (or not of this world) allow any of these guys to say what they have already? If the clinton machine can basically off anyone, at any time, in plain sight, and get away with it, these guys shouldn’t be walking.
The speaker is Stephen Greer. He organized the Disclosure Project on May 9, 2001. He had about 20 professional and military people testify to what they had experienced about ETs and their craft, who also said they would testify to Congress under oath.
I don’t know why, but this guy’s testimony seems way more believable than any of the recent UFO stuff to hit congress lately. This guy comes across as intelligent and informed whereas some of the other’s have seemed ‘off’???
One of the names mentioned is Vannevar Bush.
Vannevar was a mentor to John G. Trump and was, I believe, hand picked by Vannevar to review Tesla’s papers.
I don’t have my sauce for that or I’d link it. You might find more on bitchute.
Vannevar was a Mason..........hmmmm.
https://freemasonrymatters.co.uk/index.php/the-internet-and-researching-freemasonry/
Vannevar basically founded Raytheon and was involved in the Manhattan project.
The guy is definitely worth digging on past wilkipedia.
Try yandex as your search engine.
Could you explain why this is more believable than the pentagon and mil-intel officials who have testified in front of congress? Those people have well-documented, unimpeachable backgrounds.
Would be very curious to hear you elaborate on your first sentence.
Hard to explain further than I did. I have watched a couple of the testimonies (not tooooo closely) and something just seemed ‘off’ about the personnel and what they were saying. My gut feel on this guy was that he was at least a little more informed and fourth-right as a speaker.
Aside but related: Why would the most evil and technologically advanced of this world (or not of this world) allow any of these guys to say what they have already? If the clinton machine can basically off anyone, at any time, in plain sight, and get away with it, these guys shouldn’t be walking.
The speaker is Stephen Greer. He organized the Disclosure Project on May 9, 2001. He had about 20 professional and military people testify to what they had experienced about ETs and their craft, who also said they would testify to Congress under oath.
This is one machine that is good to go, easy to make but difficult to explain how it does what it does.
https://www.strikefoundation.earth/
Another: https://web.archive.org/web/20210622112939/https://www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm
And of course, Viktor Schauberger. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXPrLGUGZsw&t=49s