I was interested to note a currently stickied post regarding Netanyahu:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rm0jqADo/haaretz-an-israeli-mainstream-me/c/
The post links to a brief report that itself refers to and links to an article in the Israeli Media Outlet Haaretz:
Netanyahu Is an Existential Threat to Israel's Survival
(*Note: the article itself is inaccessible behind a paywall - even attempts to go through web.archive.org do not provide access to the article. However, for the purpose of this post, the nature of the headline itself is sufficient as a jump off point.)
EDIT: can access the full article here: https://archive.ph/x1LZY
Credit goes to u/94f450d for sharing this link.
Someone in the comment section mentioned how Haaretz is "Washington Compost In Hebrew", whatever that means. But its obviously not a laudatory remark!
Personally, I think the issue of what is happening in Israel/Palestine and the person of Netanyahu in that context, are a good opportunity to practice some anonish mental discipline and refrain from leaping to judgments. Here's why:
In conjunction with the Headline of the article (which, by the way, is inaccessible behind a paywall (even attempts to go through web.archive.org do not provide access to the article)), there are a few interesting data points to reflect on:
ONE
One interesting data point comes from recognizing how certain Neo_marxist propaganda rags (Rolling Stone: "Trump wants Netanyahu impeached", Mother Jones (?), etc) are pushing the "Trump wants Netanyahu gone before he returns to office", "Trump negotiating with 'allies' to get Netanyahu removed", and so forth.
The fact that this narrative is being put out by neo-marxist / globalist propaganda operations would suggest that there is an attack on Netanyahu that is coming from the Deep State / Globalists, for whatever reason.
Another thing to consider is that Trump's recent criticism of Netanyahu (OCT 11) could easily have been a ploy to entice the Globalists to think there is a window of attack on Netanyahu, and to expose their position, given how DJT immediately moved then to indicate how he stands in solidarity with Netanyahu two days later (OCT 13).
(Does Trump ever do things for no reason? - Rhetorical Question)
Trump says Netanyahu betrayed him before a 2020 airstrike that killed a top Iranian general: ”I’ll never forget” https://fortune.com/2023/10/12/donald-trump-benjamin-netanyahu-betrayed-2020-airstrike-iranian-general/
Trump says he stands with Netanyahu after criticism for saying he ‘let us down’
TWO
Also, consider that earlier in the year, WEF High Priest Harari, threatened and lead 'protests that will bring netanyahu down" in what maps onto the features of a color revolution. By the WEF demon, no less. This should give one pause to ask: what's that about?
For me, one thing is clear: what is happening in Israel/Palestine is far from clear (!) and who is doing what is and who is on what side is covered in the Murk of War (an upgrade from the Fog of War).
That Hamas at satanic agents is clear. That the Israel / Palestine thing has the hallmarks of a death blossom by the forces of evil, to incite mass conflict and polarization worldwide, to distract and inject maximum fear etc, this also seems clear.
POSSIBILITIES
But if OG anons will recall, when the Syria "chemical attacks on their own people" narrative became the pretext for DJT to send missiles into Syria in 2017 in "retaliation" against the Syria regime (prompting Alex Jones and others to say Trump had gone off the rails and was now an evil psycho), anons basically figured out that Trump was in fact hitting Deep State Isis strongholds etc, in a clearing operation.
This would be an example of the White Hat Patriots executing an operation of clearing under cover of doing something else completely.
I mention that, because its worth considering that it may be possible that Patriots (by which I mean, non-Globalist Sovereign actors) are using the Hamas evil attack as a pretext for actually clearing out the final strongholds of deep state terrorists in the region.
THREE
In line with this thinking, we could also consider that prior to the Hamas attack, Israel and Saudi Arabia were scheduled to sign within weeks an agreement and accord that would finally bring the keystone treaty to the middle east, wherein the State of Israel (duh, not to be confused with the Israelites) would give up Palestine and acknowledge the State of Palestine as its own state, thus acquiescing to the 2-state solution in exchange for significant normalization of relations with Saudi Arabia and the Saudi-led Arabic nations.
Did The Deep State wish to derail that agreement? Most certainly. (Note: it has only been put "on hold" by Saudi Arabia, and not been cancelled.) Is Netanyahu acting for the Deep State? or for the Sovereign Patriots? I think that is VERY hard to know at this point, if one is willing to put one's prejudices and biases aside.
BUT if that agreement was to actually go ahead, logically, it could NOT be concluded with Deep State CIA-driven Islamo-terrorists (HAMAS) controlling and ruling that Palestinian State.
It logically fits that for the accord to go ahead, coming as it does on the foundation of DJT's Abraham Accords, the HAMAS element would necessarily have to be cleared first. Otherwise, Israel would essentially be creating a Terrorist State, possibly even more extreme that Iran, right next to themselves.
OTHER
There will be a whole lot of other data points with regards to who or what Netanyahu is, was, and what role he currently plays in the State of Israel. No doubt others will have lots of digs on that topic; I don't really have that much. However, what I want to highlight in this post is the impact of the NARRATIVE aspects of the war, HOW Netanyahu is being portrayed or attacked/defended, and by whom, with reflections on possibilities as to WHY.
KEEP YOUR COGNITIVE POWDER DRY
I think there are data points that point in both directions: Bibi as Deep State Globalist AND Bibi as beleaguered Sovereign Patriot working to free Israel from the Deep State (just as DJT was surrounded by Deep State infrastructure and network during the first administration).
For that reason, I'm keeping my discernment powder dry. I'm watching, observing and taking note of things as they unfold, and withholding judgment or assessment.
I mean, after all, the Murk of War. And in Information Narrative Warfare, the enemy is ALWAYS trying to put us off kilter, and to get us to preemptively judge and react in a way that helps to distort the true picture before it emerges.
Also, NOTE:
If the Enemy can get anons and truth Patriots to adopt hard and fast prejudged positions on the current situation, it makes it much easier for them - the enemy - to pit us against each other based on differing opinions and to cause conflict and division in our ranks. Taking the wait and see, observe and reflect approach facilitates our cohesion and capacity to work together and discuss, to listen to each other, which is ultimately the best way to eventually flesh out and ferret out the real truth.
I'm curious about something not discussed above. We know that Israel was the first to accept en mass the C-19 jabs. We know that Pfizer, Moderna, Gates, WHO are all aligned with WEF Klaus Schwab. Being first to go all in means to me either Bibi wanted to protect the Israelis OR he was deceived as were the rest of the world that those jabs were safe. It seems to me that having almost the entire country getting jabbed and boosted would suggest that health issues we know are related to these injections would be off the charts. I haven't heard or seen much regarding this. We also know that the Palestinians did not receive the jabs in the same proportion. In a sense they were a control group.
Did the globalists align with the Palestinians to deceive Israel into jumping on the vaccine bandwagon or did Israel get special batches of the vax that didn't have as many side effects? Was it used as a bio-weapon against them or as a shield by Israel?
Ive been assuming Israel took delivery of a benign variant of the jab and went full-fascist over making people take it purely to divert attention that they had a hand in creating it (I see the gangsters in control of Israel as essentially the deep state itself, the enemy) "Look at Israel forcing the jab on their people - clearly they are victims too" gambit
OR, (variation) the jab is tuned to not affect the particular genetic make up of the deep-state type of Israeli/Jew - the jabs are a weapon that doesn't affect them. (*RFK said as much, something like Ashkenazi and Finnish people are resistant to the bad effects of the jab, something like that) so they could safely take it en masse and all it will do is kill those of them who are of a different genetic line - which they would welcome as a kind of purifying ritual.
Dasting.
I can imagine this scenario:
The State of Israel, as a (the?) Rothschild Cabal stronghold, worked overtime to set the example and lead the agenda for the despotic and authoritarian vax passport idea, BUT as a stronghold, also secured benign batches so that their own population would not be overly damaged and hamper the power of the State.
In other words, a propaganda operation.
Seems to me that this scenario is plausible.