I was interested to note a currently stickied post regarding Netanyahu:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rm0jqADo/haaretz-an-israeli-mainstream-me/c/
The post links to a brief report that itself refers to and links to an article in the Israeli Media Outlet Haaretz:
Netanyahu Is an Existential Threat to Israel's Survival
(*Note: the article itself is inaccessible behind a paywall - even attempts to go through web.archive.org do not provide access to the article. However, for the purpose of this post, the nature of the headline itself is sufficient as a jump off point.)
EDIT: can access the full article here: https://archive.ph/x1LZY
Credit goes to u/94f450d for sharing this link.
Someone in the comment section mentioned how Haaretz is "Washington Compost In Hebrew", whatever that means. But its obviously not a laudatory remark!
Personally, I think the issue of what is happening in Israel/Palestine and the person of Netanyahu in that context, are a good opportunity to practice some anonish mental discipline and refrain from leaping to judgments. Here's why:
In conjunction with the Headline of the article (which, by the way, is inaccessible behind a paywall (even attempts to go through web.archive.org do not provide access to the article)), there are a few interesting data points to reflect on:
ONE
One interesting data point comes from recognizing how certain Neo_marxist propaganda rags (Rolling Stone: "Trump wants Netanyahu impeached", Mother Jones (?), etc) are pushing the "Trump wants Netanyahu gone before he returns to office", "Trump negotiating with 'allies' to get Netanyahu removed", and so forth.
The fact that this narrative is being put out by neo-marxist / globalist propaganda operations would suggest that there is an attack on Netanyahu that is coming from the Deep State / Globalists, for whatever reason.
Another thing to consider is that Trump's recent criticism of Netanyahu (OCT 11) could easily have been a ploy to entice the Globalists to think there is a window of attack on Netanyahu, and to expose their position, given how DJT immediately moved then to indicate how he stands in solidarity with Netanyahu two days later (OCT 13).
(Does Trump ever do things for no reason? - Rhetorical Question)
Trump says Netanyahu betrayed him before a 2020 airstrike that killed a top Iranian general: ”I’ll never forget” https://fortune.com/2023/10/12/donald-trump-benjamin-netanyahu-betrayed-2020-airstrike-iranian-general/
Trump says he stands with Netanyahu after criticism for saying he ‘let us down’
TWO
Also, consider that earlier in the year, WEF High Priest Harari, threatened and lead 'protests that will bring netanyahu down" in what maps onto the features of a color revolution. By the WEF demon, no less. This should give one pause to ask: what's that about?
For me, one thing is clear: what is happening in Israel/Palestine is far from clear (!) and who is doing what is and who is on what side is covered in the Murk of War (an upgrade from the Fog of War).
That Hamas at satanic agents is clear. That the Israel / Palestine thing has the hallmarks of a death blossom by the forces of evil, to incite mass conflict and polarization worldwide, to distract and inject maximum fear etc, this also seems clear.
POSSIBILITIES
But if OG anons will recall, when the Syria "chemical attacks on their own people" narrative became the pretext for DJT to send missiles into Syria in 2017 in "retaliation" against the Syria regime (prompting Alex Jones and others to say Trump had gone off the rails and was now an evil psycho), anons basically figured out that Trump was in fact hitting Deep State Isis strongholds etc, in a clearing operation.
This would be an example of the White Hat Patriots executing an operation of clearing under cover of doing something else completely.
I mention that, because its worth considering that it may be possible that Patriots (by which I mean, non-Globalist Sovereign actors) are using the Hamas evil attack as a pretext for actually clearing out the final strongholds of deep state terrorists in the region.
THREE
In line with this thinking, we could also consider that prior to the Hamas attack, Israel and Saudi Arabia were scheduled to sign within weeks an agreement and accord that would finally bring the keystone treaty to the middle east, wherein the State of Israel (duh, not to be confused with the Israelites) would give up Palestine and acknowledge the State of Palestine as its own state, thus acquiescing to the 2-state solution in exchange for significant normalization of relations with Saudi Arabia and the Saudi-led Arabic nations.
Did The Deep State wish to derail that agreement? Most certainly. (Note: it has only been put "on hold" by Saudi Arabia, and not been cancelled.) Is Netanyahu acting for the Deep State? or for the Sovereign Patriots? I think that is VERY hard to know at this point, if one is willing to put one's prejudices and biases aside.
BUT if that agreement was to actually go ahead, logically, it could NOT be concluded with Deep State CIA-driven Islamo-terrorists (HAMAS) controlling and ruling that Palestinian State.
It logically fits that for the accord to go ahead, coming as it does on the foundation of DJT's Abraham Accords, the HAMAS element would necessarily have to be cleared first. Otherwise, Israel would essentially be creating a Terrorist State, possibly even more extreme that Iran, right next to themselves.
OTHER
There will be a whole lot of other data points with regards to who or what Netanyahu is, was, and what role he currently plays in the State of Israel. No doubt others will have lots of digs on that topic; I don't really have that much. However, what I want to highlight in this post is the impact of the NARRATIVE aspects of the war, HOW Netanyahu is being portrayed or attacked/defended, and by whom, with reflections on possibilities as to WHY.
KEEP YOUR COGNITIVE POWDER DRY
I think there are data points that point in both directions: Bibi as Deep State Globalist AND Bibi as beleaguered Sovereign Patriot working to free Israel from the Deep State (just as DJT was surrounded by Deep State infrastructure and network during the first administration).
For that reason, I'm keeping my discernment powder dry. I'm watching, observing and taking note of things as they unfold, and withholding judgment or assessment.
I mean, after all, the Murk of War. And in Information Narrative Warfare, the enemy is ALWAYS trying to put us off kilter, and to get us to preemptively judge and react in a way that helps to distort the true picture before it emerges.
Also, NOTE:
If the Enemy can get anons and truth Patriots to adopt hard and fast prejudged positions on the current situation, it makes it much easier for them - the enemy - to pit us against each other based on differing opinions and to cause conflict and division in our ranks. Taking the wait and see, observe and reflect approach facilitates our cohesion and capacity to work together and discuss, to listen to each other, which is ultimately the best way to eventually flesh out and ferret out the real truth.
Thanks for the feedback Chuck.
Disclaimer: (with apologies). I think and treat all the "this is not that person but a clone or masked actor" propositions, suppositions and hypotheses as bunk and not worth my time.
That said, alternatively, in a game of chess, for example, the winning player can and will force the opponent to make certain moves that in the end, undermine their defense and grant the winning player advantages. The key idea here is forcing the opponent into having no choice but to do X.
So to my mind, there is always the option that X player (i.e. Bibi) was once Deep State controlled, but through serious mechanisms, has come to be White Hat controlled, and is being forced or required to make moves he would not under other circumstances.
If that's the case, then the WEF would want to intervene and bring him down, because he is no longer reliable as "their guy".
Among many possibilities, that is one I think is worth considering.
I agree with you that people's roles can change due to a change in circumstances--many of which we now know are manipulated. I'd say that the "masked actor" theories can be discounted for the present because whether these people are the real people or not currently doesn't matter since the world accepts them as the real people and they are, therefore, functionally so.
If/when the day comes that the masses become aware that there are stand-ins of whatever sort for these people, then ignoring it won't be an option. At some point we will all want to know that the people making decisions on our behalf that we voted for to do so are, in fact, the people we voted for and not a stand-in puppet on a string.
The thing that I see as the undoing of all the deep state players is that they cannot help themselves: their own personal interests are always paramount, so even when the shit is hitting the fan for the globalist/deep state agenda, if they can sell out one of their deep state competitors to get a bit ahead, they'll do it. They're not capable of assessing their situation in an objective way--mostly because they're narcissists: self-aggrandizing, lacking introspection, arrogant, manipulative, needing control.
Also, I dare say, are obsessed and dominated by evil, and as such, are slaves to evil's purposes and intents. It's not a state one can easily free oneself from. Hence the concept of 'selling one's soul to the devil'. Which is not a literal thing, but is a metaphor for sacrificing the capacity to make one's own choices (by developing a binding connection with the spiritual center of evil) for the purpose of gaining power, control or wealth.
"(by developing a binding connection with the spiritual center of evil)"
I've not thought of selling one's soul to the devil as a metaphor before. I've seen it for quite some time as literal, which is ironic in retrospect since there was a period of my life where I didn't believe in the devil/Satan at all.
When you say "by developing a binding connection with the spiritual center of evil", what do you mean by that? I'm not quite following.
Hmmmm.... This takes a bit of explanation, but I'll try to be succinct.
The fundamental principle of all existence is a "give and receive action". This is displayed when two parties interact, one by initiating a connection - giving something (energy, attention, materials, information, love, etc) and the other by responding to that overture - by receiving what is given.
When the receiving party responds by giving something back to the initiating party (energy, attention, materials, information, love, etc), a reciprocal connection is established, and the two parties now form a higher unit, a "unity" if you will, a new "party" in its own right, the two unified in a common purpose and direction.
Example (molecular): Nucleus of atom (+) exerts an influence over an electron (-) by nature of their mutual common character (energy). The electron responds by accepting the influence of the nucleus, and establishes an orbit 'around' it. Thus, the two (or more electrons) form an atom. The atom is the unified body of the nucleus and electron(s) interacting in a reciprocal dynamic. The atom can now interact with other atoms as either a giving or receiving party in its own right, and thus molecules are formed.
The same principle applies to human relationships. E.g. Man meets woman, man expresses feelings for woman (attention, love), the woman responds (returns beauty, affection, etc). As the reciprocal connection increases, they give more to each other and receive more from each other, and a love bond is formed. They become a couple, a unified entity comprised of the man and woman together. They can interact with others, friends, family, other couples, society, etc, both as individuals, but ALSO as a unified unit. (Hence, the scripture that a man will leave his parents and cleave to his wife, and they become "one flesh".)
This can even eventually generate new life, as if / when they interact sexually, and their sperm/eggs meet, that sperm and egg establish that same reciprocal relationship, and a child is conceived.
The point here is that the foundation for all existence, action and multiplication comes through a giving and receiving action that develops and binds the parties closer together, forming a unity.
The real experience of heartache and pain that happens when a treasured connection is lost (e.g. relationship breakup) is because something is being destroyed, dying as it were: the unity that was once established by the relationship.
If we consider that 'the devil/Satan' is a spiritual being that became a force unto itself in the direction of evil (aka the opposite of the direction of God the Creator), then when a person undertakes actions, intent, purposes that align with that evil direction, they form a relationship with Satan aka the center of evil.
This relationship might be initiated by Satan via one of the myriad evil spirits that themselves are connected to and "united' with Satan (aka under the direct influence and control of Satan), and the person responds - i.e. being tempted to do something evil and then responding to that temptation.
Satan influences the world via millions and millions of evil spirits connected to him and bound by the reciprocal connection established via receiving influence, energy, direction, emotional power, etc, from the Satanic center, and then responding.
However, the nature of evil is that it enslaves. Once that connection is made, the stronger it gets, the harder it is to break free.
This is the opposite of how God works. God works through love and truth. When we respond to God's truth (in whatever form it comes to us), and we return faith, love, loyalty, etc in response, then we establish a reciprocal connection with God and the relationship can begin to grow. The ultimate purpose of that connection is to become unified with God, to enter into a unity with God where God manifests as our center and heart, and we are the flesh or body (aka "temple") of God.
This is the state of being that Jesus accomplished and perfected for the first time in human history, but it is, in my understanding, the purpose for which each and every human being is created.
Our true nature is from God, and so establishing a unity and reciprocal connection with God is the manifestation of our true, original nature. However, we also have fallen nature from Satan, received by our ancestors "Adam and Eve" when they established a give-and-receive relationship with Lucifer, one that ripped them away from God (their connection with Lucifer overwhelmed and destroyed their growing connection with God) and created such a bond of unity with evil that it was inherited and passed down through each generation, such that God has been working since that long distant history to slowly build his connection with us, via increasingly revealing truth, reviving our capacity for faith, love and goodness, the purpose of which is to eventually rescue us completely from Satan's "orbit" and pull us completely in to his own.
That separation from evil is begun spiritually through the relationship with Jesus, but (obviously) is incomplete, as the war still ages on. But the promise and prophecy of the Kingdom of Heaven (on Earth AS IN 'heaven' (spiritual realms)) is a message of truth that ultimately, humanity will be removed from Satan's orbit and become completely free to manifest fully our own true, God-given nature.
Ok, that was longer than I intended, but I hope that it makes sense.
When a person 'sins', repeatedly, it increasingly builds the connection with evil. The longer and deeper that connection, the more binding it becomes.
Satanists, etc, who do the worst, most evil things in order to rise in influence and power, etc, are handing over their potential to orbit God and enslaving it to Satanic control. Metaphorically, this is "selling one's soul to the devil".
Does this shed some light on what I meant?