Science...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Only one is real, the other is CGI.
How come it is possible to see the rings of saturn through a telescope then?
Do you happen to have a photo of it, taken it yourself? I'd like to see that.
When I saw it I didn't have a way to take a photo of it. It's only a memory of visiting the outdoor observatory one night. I saw the rings of saturn and a globular cluster. The space station went overhead also but that was visible to the naked eye.
Seeing isn't always believing. Michelle Obama has been portrayed as a classy black woman for a decade and we see as one without discerning eyes because of the brain conditioning done. In reality he is a nasty gay man with altercation done to his body with evil intentions behind that smiling face. Los Angeles - the city of angels is what we were told. Now we know its a city of evil pedo empires that sucked our money and attention through smoke and mirrors thrown at us. "Smoke and mirrors" - NASA does it ALL the time. They have $70M dollar budget per day, they can rig up pretty much anything.
Question everything. Then you see things differently.
Even better : how can you see Saturn and easily see a 3 dimensional ball inside a set of rings? You can see the shadow of the ball on the rings ; quite cool.
For the flat earth morons : If space is fake then the images of space are projected onto the firmament, yes? So, where are they being projected from?
And if that is true, then why would two separate locations ( on earth ) render the exact same perspective of an object in space? A projected image would create a different perspective of said object when photographed from different locations. As in : if I take a picture of Saturn from the east coast, why is the exact same perspective of Saturn achieved when taking a picture from Japan?
But, that's arguing with people that don't even know how a zoom lens works. They think it works like a macro lens - a magnifier. A zoom lens isn't a magnifier.
Zeteticists would argue that Saturn and the other planets (called wondering stars by the ancients - in fact, the word "planet" comes from the Greek word planetes, meaning "wanderer.") are located in a layer beyond the Moon and Sun, but not “out there” in outer space - at least, that’s what they tell me when I ask them questions about this.
—Cosmologist George Ellis in Scientific American, "Thinking Globally, Acting Universally", October 1995
Why do so many different accounts on this board talk about exactly the same things in exactly the same way as that guy who used his real name on glp did? Earth realm, zeteticism, lost valuables overboard in a boat accident/botched suicide attempt, etc.? Just use one fucking account and stop trying to have an outsized influence.
Flerfers also can't seem to explain how magnetic compasses work if there is only a "north" pole and no south. That would mean that magnetic monopoles exist except you can do your simple science experiment to see that all magnets are dipole. They'll probably just try to stay it's a conspiracy and Big Magnet makes them all that way.
Also where is the profit motive for faking a round Earth and space and all that?
While it's accurate that unipolar magnets are not feasible, this, unfortunately, doesn't pose an issue for Flat Earth proponents. Ring magnets, resembling “flat disks,” can exhibit radial magnetization. In a radial magnet, a magnetic pole is situated at the center, while the other extends across all points along the magnet's edge. This type of magnet, akin to those in loudspeakers, is suggested by flat earthers to mirror Earth's magnetic arrangement."