Hosts of people don't believe in the moon landing and neither did I because of the gravity problem. It just looks very fake. Maybe they were there, but I wouldn't put it pass them to lie about it.
They'll lie about anything, even if you shove the proof in their face. I don't know one way or another. I did stand next to a Saturn V rocket at NASA and the thing was freaking huge. I also saw a replica of the lander and it looked like it was covered in tin foil. So many inconsistencies. For what it's worth, I have some friends that now work for Lockheed Martin that swear they've bounced lasers off mirrors that were left behind on the moon and that that is how we know the moon is moving away from us very slowly. I can also say that if I was the Russians and the US faked it, I would out the US as fast as I could. Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't place a bet one way or the other.
I think that the launch vehicle would have to be real. People were on the ground watching/recording when that thing launched. Doesn't mean it put anything into orbit though. Once the launch is done, everyone is expected to trust what NASA broadcasts to their radios and televisions. Could be a Kubrick flick, could be real. What video's I've seen left me neutral, because they could be faked too. Maybe they actually did make it to the moon, but were unable to show the footage (for reasons) and had to fake what they presented to the people. So many possibilities!
Including the actual one: it was real. You can't fake lunar gravity, and that shows clearly on the videos, especially the behavior of the dust kicked up by the Moon Buggy. Or the nearness of the horizon. And if you've ever been at a major launch, you would know something Real has happened.
You would rather believe liars who lie to you about the Moon, than honest people who tell the truth about the Moon. You are nowhere.
It was covered in Kapton foil with an aluminum backing. That was solar radiation shielding to prevent the underlying structure from heating up.
https://apollo11space.com/apollo-11-kapton-foil/ It helps to research topics of discussion.
I was just trying to communicate that it looked cheap from a real "eyes on" perspective for those that hadn't seen it in real life. When it comes to NASA, there isn't a source of info that I trust completely.
Okay. But you have to figure out how to live, if you basically cannot rely on anything written or anyone who might write it. "Trust" is overrated. It implies that you can let others do your thinking for you. The better defense is knowledge: learning enough that you can correlate what you've learned with what you are told. You have to rely on sources that are used for real purposes, like engineering, physics, chemistry, or medicine. Textbooks, not internet articles.
Especially be critical of those who denounce everything as lies, for they are the camp from which operators like Jim Jones comes from. Civilization is a collective enterprise; it disintegrates if it is impossible to find truth.
Hosts of people don't believe in the moon landing and neither did I because of the gravity problem. It just looks very fake. Maybe they were there, but I wouldn't put it pass them to lie about it.
They'll lie about anything, even if you shove the proof in their face. I don't know one way or another. I did stand next to a Saturn V rocket at NASA and the thing was freaking huge. I also saw a replica of the lander and it looked like it was covered in tin foil. So many inconsistencies. For what it's worth, I have some friends that now work for Lockheed Martin that swear they've bounced lasers off mirrors that were left behind on the moon and that that is how we know the moon is moving away from us very slowly. I can also say that if I was the Russians and the US faked it, I would out the US as fast as I could. Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't place a bet one way or the other.
I think that the launch vehicle would have to be real. People were on the ground watching/recording when that thing launched. Doesn't mean it put anything into orbit though. Once the launch is done, everyone is expected to trust what NASA broadcasts to their radios and televisions. Could be a Kubrick flick, could be real. What video's I've seen left me neutral, because they could be faked too. Maybe they actually did make it to the moon, but were unable to show the footage (for reasons) and had to fake what they presented to the people. So many possibilities!
Including the actual one: it was real. You can't fake lunar gravity, and that shows clearly on the videos, especially the behavior of the dust kicked up by the Moon Buggy. Or the nearness of the horizon. And if you've ever been at a major launch, you would know something Real has happened.
You would rather believe liars who lie to you about the Moon, than honest people who tell the truth about the Moon. You are nowhere.
How much would silencing thousands cost?
Didn't you know star trek was a documentary?
It was covered in Kapton foil with an aluminum backing. That was solar radiation shielding to prevent the underlying structure from heating up. https://apollo11space.com/apollo-11-kapton-foil/ It helps to research topics of discussion.
I was just trying to communicate that it looked cheap from a real "eyes on" perspective for those that hadn't seen it in real life. When it comes to NASA, there isn't a source of info that I trust completely.
Okay. But you have to figure out how to live, if you basically cannot rely on anything written or anyone who might write it. "Trust" is overrated. It implies that you can let others do your thinking for you. The better defense is knowledge: learning enough that you can correlate what you've learned with what you are told. You have to rely on sources that are used for real purposes, like engineering, physics, chemistry, or medicine. Textbooks, not internet articles.
Especially be critical of those who denounce everything as lies, for they are the camp from which operators like Jim Jones comes from. Civilization is a collective enterprise; it disintegrates if it is impossible to find truth.
Don't forget they invented tang for nasa. That's proof rheybwent to the moon. Plus a moon pen.
No. I am not going to place bets on this one even though I talk about bets all the time. LOL