Not sure what you mean. I looked at the original pdf in wikileaks and it looks like an M not RN.
I used to work in a job that had a lot to do with OCR. If doesn't take a lot of scans to come across errors like these naturally. For me to believe this was intentional, I have to see it in something that didn't originate in a scanned document.
Don't you think WikiLeaks would have brought attention to this if it were true? Wouldn't they have immediately discovered it?
That’s not an ocr error. Look at the original email, it’s the same font kerning bullshit as corney.
Not sure what you mean. I looked at the original pdf in wikileaks and it looks like an M not RN. I used to work in a job that had a lot to do with OCR. If doesn't take a lot of scans to come across errors like these naturally. For me to believe this was intentional, I have to see it in something that didn't originate in a scanned document. Don't you think WikiLeaks would have brought attention to this if it were true? Wouldn't they have immediately discovered it?
Look at it closer, there are artifacts that make it obvious. If you look at examples for corney, it’s also looks like an M but it’s not.