No but I think his awareness of geopolitics is at a much higher level than the average citizen. He was correct to state that NATO did not have the stockpiles to compete with Russia or to ramp up production for the war in Ukraine.
But you do not need to be an expert to see that the global economy is very fragile right now and security around the world is very on edge.
If security is on edge trying to delay/stop an election in the nation with the most heavily armed, and increasingly angry, civilian population seems like a bad idea. I wouldn't want to guess what percentage of that population, the likely majority of which believes the last election was stolen, might decide to when you confirm that notion by avoiding having an election.
No but I think his awareness of geopolitics is at a much higher level than the average citizen. He was correct to state that NATO did not have the stockpiles to compete with Russia or to ramp up production for the war in Ukraine.
But you do not need to be an expert to see that the global economy is very fragile right now and security around the world is very on edge.
If security is on edge trying to delay/stop an election in the nation with the most heavily armed, and increasingly angry, civilian population seems like a bad idea. I wouldn't want to guess what percentage of that population, the likely majority of which believes the last election was stolen, might decide to when you confirm that notion by avoiding having an election.
After the plandemic I can not dismiss any possibility because we haven't seen the worst yet.