Steve Kirsch’s MIT talk on 11/30 (he starts around 24 mins):
https://rumble.com/v3yovx4-vsrf-live-104-exclusive-mit-speech-by-steve-kirsch.html
The latest 4 articles on Kirsch’s substack are all on this topic:
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios
Igor Chudov’s analysis of the data:
Professor Norman Fenton’s response (he is referenced in Kirsch’s MIT talk):
This is so difficult as we know that there are excess deaths and we so badly want proof. How do we tell if this revelation from the DB guy is not staged - my biggest suspicion is the timing of him coming forward - rather late in the game, no? For me as well - he doth protest too much - telling us over and over again why he had to come forward. He comes off as unstable, and for this reason alone I would not share this with anyone who needed convincing. Note: There are multiple videos and each is different - just the introductory one really bothered me.
I suggest that the whistleblower came out because of the change in government.
That’s a good call and could bode well for other whistleblowers-in-waiting who are justifiably too intimidated or too scared to speak out until conditions are safe. Not much short of personal destitution up to and including unemployment, reputational damage, bankruptcy and even death awaits many who try.
Many have lost their employment because they refused the vax. The Labour leader is now saying that their government never 'forced' anyone to take it, but, plenty of people lost their jobs, because their employers said take it or leave. So, they weren't forced, because they chose to leave, or something.
Others took the vax to try and keep their jobs, and were injured.
Yeah, I loved that argument.
Your honour, I told the cashier “put the money in the bag bitch, and I won’t shoot you.” She CHOSE to give me the money, she’s to blame.”