“From what we have established to date, the individual downloaded a large amount of vaccine related information. We are still working to confirm the full extent of this activity,”
So it's real data then.
The data, as published on an overseas site, appears to have been anonymised.
Well that is what scientists are supposed to do. So that is fine.
Apa said an injunction had been granted by the Employment Relations Authority that prevents any publication of the data.
Yeah, but there are whistleblower protection laws, also.
“We have already used the injunction to have information taken down from an overseas website and cybersecurity specialists are continuing to scan extensively for any other places where the information may appear.”
Admits to censorship. too late.
The person has no clinical background or expert vaccine knowledge and appears to be trying to spread misinformation,” Apa said.
So it's real data then.
Well that is what scientists are supposed to do. So that is fine.
Yeah, but there are whistleblower protection laws, also.
Admits to censorship. too late.
One needs statistical background, owever.