Recently, more and more food manufacturers have been adding QR codes to their products.
They list it as being a link to the full nutritional information. There are obviously only two reasons they would do this:
- Hide Information
- Track who looks at their information “This one can see.”
While obvious, I didn’t bother to confirm this until yesterday. Any QR code was simply considered to have poison in it, in spite of the label, if it had a QR code.
This is now confirmed.
“This product only has onions, spices, and tomato puree, we super promise!!!” “Click here for the full nutrition information.”
borrow some random old couple’s phone to scan the code
4th tab over out of 5 “additional information” 3rd collapsed textbox down out of 8
“Oh yeah, this crap totally has bioengineered ingredients in it too. Sorry we ran out of space!!!” “Hey, I know you’re sick and I’m very, very sorry, but we DID warn you!!!” said the Satanist.
As a general rule, it is probably quite reasonable to assume anything from CONagra is poison.
I'm just asking which specific product you validated this with so I can do the same. I'm not asking for many examples, literally just the one that you performed this exercise with.
There is nothing to validate if you cannot provide even a single tangible example of what you are talking about.
I am curious myself as I would like to have a better idea of how this labeling is being done, and I would prefer not to spend hours looking at labels of food that I already do not buy.
Try Talenti Gelato (A UniLever Company, because deodorant and ice cream are the perfect vertical supply chain integration) if you like.
It’s everywhere, though.