Exactly. A SINGLE BATCH had 21% fatality rate (so far); every other batch, even in the "top ten", was significantly lower than that -- still horribly unsafe, but far from 20%.
And the OVERALL death rate (so far) from the injections is MUCH lower than 20%.
yes, the title is misleading, and that is a form of well-poisoning. That leads to the above comment: Oh not all batches were like that! Which leads to the erroneous conclusion that it must be safe after all, or something.
Agreed that not all batches were like that, but one must realize that these are not low numbers. Even a 1% death rate is normally completely unacceptable. That clinic should have been sending smoke signals to the Ministry if even one person died:
So in 2012 there was this study:
Among 13,033,274 vaccinated people, 15,455 deaths occurred between 0 and 60 days following vaccination. The mortality rate within 60 days of a vaccination visit was 442.5 deaths per 100,000 person-years.
That's more like 0.4% death rate (per year of the study), after introducing vaccine. That was considered 'safe' in those days. So for a clinic where n=246, the 'safe' death rate would have been 0.98: less than 1.
Personally, I think that safety rates can go to somewhere the sun don't shine. One would not want to be one of the unlucky ones (those 444.2 individuals per 100000 vaxed).
Oh you only have 0.4% chance of dying if you take this older vax. So much safer.
Exactly. A SINGLE BATCH had 21% fatality rate (so far); every other batch, even in the "top ten", was significantly lower than that -- still horribly unsafe, but far from 20%.
And the OVERALL death rate (so far) from the injections is MUCH lower than 20%.
Very misleading.
yes, the title is misleading, and that is a form of well-poisoning. That leads to the above comment: Oh not all batches were like that! Which leads to the erroneous conclusion that it must be safe after all, or something.
Agreed that not all batches were like that, but one must realize that these are not low numbers. Even a 1% death rate is normally completely unacceptable. That clinic should have been sending smoke signals to the Ministry if even one person died:
So in 2012 there was this study:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23790993/
That's more like 0.4% death rate (per year of the study), after introducing vaccine. That was considered 'safe' in those days. So for a clinic where n=246, the 'safe' death rate would have been 0.98: less than 1.
Personally, I think that safety rates can go to somewhere the sun don't shine. One would not want to be one of the unlucky ones (those 444.2 individuals per 100000 vaxed).
Oh you only have 0.4% chance of dying if you take this older vax. So much safer.