McCarthy "That's a Wrap" Q 5:5 Drop 1133
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Also in the video McCarthy posted he drops a 17 in the first sentence. 😁
He has been in congress for 17 years. So is he a good guy cause how'd he work out to be the 55th speaker and worked in congress for 17 yrs and put out this tweet?
Doubt it. Most likely he was caught by white hats, told what to do to serve his “sentence” (got a deal) and at the end of that told to resign. He is s puppet and these are comms that he is now under Q control and has completed his part of the plan.
https://twitter.com/SpeakerMcCarthy/status/1732438039832510986
https://files.catbox.moe/v00xby.mp4
Nice, simple and direct.
What is the connection between 17 and 55?
I don't see any connection their.
OP must know, he drew the line i guess.
17 5:5.
Q is loud and clear
I am sick of these Q non-proofs.
I do not recall Q ever saying we should look for the timestamp to correspond to the post-number, especially since Q never provided post numbers.
Why is the 55 connected to the 17? How is that any connection at all?
You new here?? Oh... handshake..... C'mon maaaan! kek Yea I know, it's a stretch, it's all just a coincident, timestamps don't matter at all (not even timestamp on Q drops), and 5:5 is something Anons made up.
Start > https://files.catbox.moe/fjoyqd.pdf
Think: it is not possible to coordinate the 55th speaker of the house. Q used coincidences that it was possible to coordinate, such as timestamps between posts and Trump tweets.
The 11:33 is the length of the video. Q used coarse grain timestamps (to the minute) of a post, never the length of anything.
So no, this image is not a proof of anything. That said, the video starting with the word "Seventeen" sounds like the kind of proof that Q would in fact coordinate: if there is a seventeen somewhere, they would be sure to highlight it by saying it and even making it the first word.