Over the last several months, I’ve been putting in 12 hour shifts, I haven’t really seen a lot of news out about where Trump is in his legal battles. I see some post about how he’s doing in the polls, but I’m trying to figure out if there’s a chance that he’ll be ok with this court case! Any news/updates for me … and others ..please..
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Nice try trolling.
No … I’m sincere! I don’t watch MSM and I was just too tired to scroll through this to find what I was looking for, so I just posted it. I just moved also and I’m in a mountain region and I don’t have any reception or Internet.
President Trump has had a few wins, as well as a few setbacks, but other than NY, these big cases aren't even close to the trials.
There have been solid examples of bias by the judges and the District Attorneys, but they don't seem to care. I'm not an attorney; however, it seems the majority of legal opinions indicate the bias would certainly be grounds for President Trump to win on appeal.
The moron judge in NY has already decided he was guilty before the trial (no jury) so that's how it will probably end.... and then it will likely get overturned.
On the GA case, Jim Jordan (Judiciary Committee) is on Fani's fanny about colluding with the J6 committee, which is only one of her many issues.
The judge in Florida overruled Jack Smith who wanted to seal some documents and not turn over to Trump's attorneys. Those should be juicy...
One big setback was a court deciding Trump has no presidential immunity against J6 lawsuits, so there will likely be a barrage of people suing him for their emotional distress--blah, blah, blah. On the other hand, more J6 videos are now being released, plus additional people are coming forward with proof it was all a setup. The J6 public opinion tide is turning (in Trump's favor).
Speaking of J6, the "Select Committee" destroyed videotapes of depositions and other documents, which is the destruction of government records... and makes them look even more sleazy. I think that is also illegal, but they're Democrats so they have nothing to fear...
So far, President Trump has won in all of the states that were trying to keep him off the state ballots based on the 14th Amendment. Maybe this will take the wind out of the sails of most of the remaining states that hoped this was going to be the solution to take out Trump.
Several attorneys provide overviews of Trump's cases almost daily on YouTube, Rumble, and/or other places. Robert Gouveia (YT), Scott Goulet (YT), Robert Barnes (Rumble - VivaBarnes). I'm sure others do the same, but I don't visit many social media sites, so I'm stating 3 that I do follow.
Also, Julie Kelly is an investigative reporter who gives a lot of updates on Twitter. I'm not sure if she's an attorney, but she attends many court hearings and has a lot of good info on the J6 trials (and videotapes).
Hope this helps (from a non-attorney perspective). 😉
Awesome! Thanks for the reply and update! Appreciate it! I did hear of the gag orders, and I saw a picture of that judge, he looked absolutely evil. That’s why I wanted the update, because I was curious to know how far it went.
You're very welcome.
And speaking of the "evil" judge, this is Robert Gouveia's update on part of that case today:
"Expert Says Mar-a-Lago MASSIVELY UNDERVALUED (but Engoron Doesn't Care)"
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4-czWTTNfU]
Apparently the jury notices for DC just started to go out. There's going to be prescreening process, so they probably are starting early
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dc-court-appears-prepping-trump-jury-selection-residents-reportedly-revealing-notice?intcmp=tw_pols
NY Case
The trial is about deciding other issues. The main issue is the amount of "disgorgement of profits" Trump will pay and a ban on future NY business including >A five-year ban on Trump or the Trump Organization applying for loans from any financial institutions chartered by or registered in New York. The AG is asking for a disgorgement of $250 million.
The finding of liability for fraud and the turning the Trump LLCs over to receivership to be dissolved was decided. Waiting on appeal.
Trump has had some good defense witnesses and some bad ones. I could see the awarding less than the AG is asking for. One witness pointed that high net wealth private banking is not just about that client but other clients that person could lead to you. Another mentioned even if the loan said Trump needed to maintain $2.5 billion in net wealth, going below that would not be a material default, it might just lead to more collateral being put up or a new rate negotiated. I thought they did good and undercut a specific witness called by the state. It seemed like he was not using realistic interest rates.
The past couple of witnesses I didn't think were too strong. They were discussing Mar a Lago. One was a guy who sold real estate in Palm Beach. Each witnesse has to testify to his or her expertise. He never graduated high school. When asking if he ever sold any social clubs in Palm Beach he said no. When asking if he used a formula to calculate Mar a Lago's value he said no. So his testimony was limited to his opinion of the value of Mar a Lago "if it was valued as a private house." Previous testimony talked about the limitations on Mar a Lago and it can't be used as a private house. So it didn't seem useful.
In the "deed of development rights" that Trump signed in 2002, the deed says
Another witness testified about development right at mar a lago, but from the 1990's before this document was signed.
Eric was supposed to testify today and they pulled him. No reason given. Trump is set to testify Monday. We will see if that goes through.
GA case Fallout from this case is starting to happen in other states. After Kenneth Chesebro plead guilty, he apparently starting hearing from other states.
He told the judge he needed to modify his bail conditions to allow him to travel to other states. he talked to NV and today 6 electors were indicted https://thehill.com/homenews/4345851-nevada-grand-jury-indicts-six-pro-trump-electors/
He supposedly is about to speak to Arizona next.
FL case There was a big drop from Jack Smith in this case. There a laws regarding federal evidence. Specifically around if the prosecutor is going to use evidence not charged in the indictment particularly character evidence in this filing, the prosecution has to give notice. In most cases this is not allowed, but there's a section of the law where you can use it.
Example, if you robbed a bank 10 years ago, it doesn't mean you robbed this bank in your new case. Prejudicial evidence would be kept out.
But if the prosecutor's can use other evidence to show for example that you are very familiar with the laws against conspiracy to rob a bank and show your actions showed consciousness of this. Not a lawyer, this is a rough example
Here's the law https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
This gives a sense of the case they will use against Trump.
Robert Gouvela discusses this filing here https://x.com/RobGouveiaEsq/status/1732510732347232322?s=20
oh, this happened too.
CNN Exclusive: Georgia prosecutors have officially added former Vice President Mike Pence on their witness list in the 2020 election subversion case against Trump https://cnn.it/3T5IexA
I am sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying.