get with the program, fren. purkiss isn't supporting vivek, he is pointing out that he talked about a few taboo subjects. at least taht is what I get out of it.
The point is that it's promoting an obvious fake. This makes it more confusing for both newly awakened and for our own rank. The newly awakened look to us to be trustworthy perveyors of news, and when we prop up obvious fakes because they said something that we wanted to hear, it makes us no better than the fakes news. We need to steer people to true patriots rather than the snake pit.
And don't get me wrong I love purkiss, and love seeing them around here! They are a fantastic contributor and provide alot of great content. I have nothing against them! I only disagree with this post, and that is all.
So if I started pushing videos of democrats, like Clinton, Obama, saying things we want to hear that d be helpful right? And it was really helpful when the media blasted it into everyone's brains 24/7 too right?
But the problem is that it DOES matter who says it.
Personally my mom who has been a huge Trump supporter since day 1 came to me last week and said she's planning on voting for vivek, because she's seen all these clips being shared of him being based and saying the right thing. So is it helpful if something voted for vivek based on short clips we post how "based" he is? We're doing no one a service with this, we're dividing our own votes. At this point we might as well have Soros saying MAGA things. who cares he's a globalist, at least hollow MAGA talk was put out there.
well, he doesnt post for idiots. if noobs need a translator to get the message to them, maybe /pol/ might be a better place for them. I get that giving time to publicize vivek is not a great idea, but it is not about the guy, it is about what he said. only the most stupid of the awakened here are really going to consider vivek at this point, because we all know he is obama2.0
get with the program, fren. purkiss isn't supporting vivek, he is pointing out that he talked about a few taboo subjects. at least taht is what I get out of it.
Thank you,That's EXACTLY what I was doing...Its about What was said , not by whom...🙏🏻
The point is that it's promoting an obvious fake. This makes it more confusing for both newly awakened and for our own rank. The newly awakened look to us to be trustworthy perveyors of news, and when we prop up obvious fakes because they said something that we wanted to hear, it makes us no better than the fakes news. We need to steer people to true patriots rather than the snake pit.
And don't get me wrong I love purkiss, and love seeing them around here! They are a fantastic contributor and provide alot of great content. I have nothing against them! I only disagree with this post, and that is all.
No, with all respect, you're wrong...I'm promoting' what was said, as I said before, Its Got Nothing to do with who's saying it...
But, you're quite welcome to disagree...😎
So if I started pushing videos of democrats, like Clinton, Obama, saying things we want to hear that d be helpful right? And it was really helpful when the media blasted it into everyone's brains 24/7 too right?
But the problem is that it DOES matter who says it.
Personally my mom who has been a huge Trump supporter since day 1 came to me last week and said she's planning on voting for vivek, because she's seen all these clips being shared of him being based and saying the right thing. So is it helpful if something voted for vivek based on short clips we post how "based" he is? We're doing no one a service with this, we're dividing our own votes. At this point we might as well have Soros saying MAGA things. who cares he's a globalist, at least hollow MAGA talk was put out there.
Lets just agree to disagree....
well, he doesnt post for idiots. if noobs need a translator to get the message to them, maybe /pol/ might be a better place for them. I get that giving time to publicize vivek is not a great idea, but it is not about the guy, it is about what he said. only the most stupid of the awakened here are really going to consider vivek at this point, because we all know he is obama2.0
No. It is about his actions and affiliations, and his history which are completely at odds with what he says.
It's okay he's heavily invested in pharma because he says the right things right?
It's okay he's a soros fellow because he says the right things right?
It's okay he led the covid response in Ohio and pushed the vaccine because he says the right things right.
You might as well vote for Biden since he said he's lowering inflation right?
You might as well vote for Biden because he said America's doing great right?
So no, it's not about what they say it's about what they do.
btw, keep this in mind:
https://patriots.win/p/17rmOEYkHH/provivek-shills-making-posts-and/c/
ok, kid.