Q made a statement that the children will unite the people. I am actually rather skeptical of this. I know images of fully developed aborted babies does nothing to change the hearts of the pro abortion bunch.
There are many children that have been taken hostage by Hamas and Pro Palestine people will tear these children's pictures from the walls.
On the other side, there are endless videos of crying injured Palestinian children shown on TV and I have seen many comments from the Pro Israeli side saying "they are not innocent. They are Palestinian. They should all be killed."
Sorry for my pessimism, but I feel the hope that images of trafficked children may ultimately unite the people seems a little naive. I'm hoping to be more optimistic about this, but my observation is that tribalism always comes in first place.
Hope someone can convince me otherwise.
I get the feeling that the issue is actually far more complex than people realize. Let me use some numbers to explain. The following is just an example, I have no idea what each actual segment looks like numerically.
Let's say that you've got 1% of the population who are committing absolute atrocities. Then you've got another 4% profiting off the atrocities, but not actually committing them. Then you've got another 5% who are being taken care of by the previously mentioned 5%. Now you've already got 10% who aren't going to look like they're united against the 1% (or their 4% cronies). Now you've got another 10% who are essentially a bunch of thugs, they may not like what the 1% and their financial buddies are doing, but it allows these people to get away with all manner of stuff that would normally be problematic. Now, add in 20% of the population are anywhere from completely brainwashed to heavily influenced to see the previously mentioned 20% as the good guys, these people are actively told that people like the Clintons have clean hands. We've already got 40% of the population accounted for here.
So, let's keep moving forward. You've got another 10-15% who are anywhere from barely scrapping by (including potentially skipping meals just to survive or feed their families) to living paycheck to paycheck. This 10-15% can't even pay attention to anything outside of their multiple jobs and feeding their family. Then you've got another 10-15% who are afraid for whatever reason (some are afraid to not be in the majority, some are afraid of something happening to them or their family, some are just afraid of speaking up). Now, we've reached 60-70% of the population. You've got another, let's say 5-10% who just don't talk about this sort of stuff because they're mentally and spiritually exhausted and they don't see enough people out there who care, so they pray and they struggle and they hope that something will change. Then you've got another 5-10% who are vocal, but they're also afraid or timid or what have you. They don't want to rock the boat or maybe they don't want to be Arkancided, etc. They only speak about it to those who they trust. So, now we've hit 70-80% of the population.
of the remaining 20-30%, you have another group of say 10% who are just completely defeated. They've accepted the fact that the cabal is horrible and in control and they see no way out, so they just live their life black-pilled. Then you've got another 10% who still think that change can be made within the system, so they push against the Clintons and those who are obviously evil, but they don't realize how widespread the problem is. Then you've got that final 0-10%, this is the people who are actively combating the problem. I have no idea how actually large this group is, but they're on this site trying to awaken as many as possible or they're out there in the world actively trying to save trafficked individuals, etc.
The above description is how I would describe the world pre-Trump, I think that now the numbers are more in our favor, but the media and the three letter agencies are censoring us so much that we don't realize just how many we've rallied to our side. Once the numbers are favorable enough, that flip is going to come hard and fast.
this is a great post and is pretty much what I think as well. Of course, we can quibble with the numbers.
What is the plan to even attempt to get this scandalous child-harming information out to everyone in a way they will believe? Is there any way to avoid a solid 30-40% simply disbelieving it, even if it were presented on national television by a worldwide military general contigent? That's another problem. WHO is going to present this information?
I've been under the impression that our job in all of this mostly to assess. We assess the information laid before us. How insidious is the enemy, are they willing to plant whistleblowers with disinfo to make us look like we're crazy? Absolutely. So our first job as a group is to sort through the noise and then figure out how to present information to those in our lives. Or at least that is what I believe we are supposed to have been doing for the past several years. By dropping hints here and there to our friends, family, and acquaintances, we are pushing the movement forward as a whole.
Most of the time, this site is anywhere from 2 months to 2 years ahead of the curve. Sometimes the information comes out and it gets ignored, but I think that's just part of how society works. The more stuff that comes out, the harder it is for people to ignore the fact that we've been consistently ahead of the curve. So, I believe that, whether we've seen the fruits of our labor or not, we, as a community, have primed a decent portion of the population for the beginnings of what I can only assume will be more and more information dropping.
I'm fairly optimistic, I believe that 30-40% of the country would openly admit to being, at the very least, willing to give the Q movement a chance if they felt that they could answer that question 1. without anyone else's knowledge and 2. without any repercussions. From my own experience, if I mention the goals of Q, a lot of people are on board as long as I don't use too many "buzzwords" or identifying words that make them feel like Q is actually involved in said goal. The media and the cabal have done a wonderful job of smearing the public opinion on this whole movement. I'd wager that there is another 10-20% who would be on board if they could see more proof of what we all already know. I think these people are only weeks to months away from being essentially on our side. After that, once people start realizing that the majority are in favor of the movement, I think we will see a quick change of pace and public opinion. As to the exact numbers on how many will ultimately reject what is right in front of them? I'd hope that it is less than 10%, but I could see it being as high as 25%. Now, that 25% will likely shrink pretty fast as I think a good deal of that group will end up in jail. Not that I necessarily think that many people are involved in the despicable practices of the cabal, but I think the cabal lets gangs and criminals get away with far more than we even realize, so I do think that the downfall of the cabal is also the downfall of a large portion organized and unorganized crime.
In short, people may not believe in the worst of the crimes at first. Which is understandable. Thus, we take stock in what we know about these people. Take Joe Biden for example. 1. Clearly he is willing to plagiarize to get his way, even the media admitted this back in the 80s. 2. Makes racist and bigoted statements on a consistent basis. 3. Likes to get weirdly close to women and often appears to smell them. 4. Has a lot of shady family business connections. 5. Has made political threats 6. Is creepily handsy with children. 7. Daughter's diary talks about showers with her father and says (probably not appropriate), the diary also says the whole family is sexually charged, even at young and not appropriate ages. 8. Hunter's laptop, at the very least, implies a lot of disgusting dirt on him and "The Big Guy"
Some of the numbers can be interchangeable, but if you can get people to admit to the smaller more obvious issue about a Joe Biden type, it becomes easier to establish the larger more problematic issues. I believe it is our job to prove that which is obvious and show that the greater crimes are not just possible, but heavily implied (hence why I used Hunter's laptop, it doesn't directly state that the Bidens are committing these atrocities, but it does lay down the groundwork for people to see that there is a pattern of problematic behavior by the entire family, which will allow the Q team (or the military or whomever) to produce the final evidence at whatever later date is necessary. Again, I believe our job is just to get the people around us primed so that when that portion of the plan moves forward, they are willing to see that these people are potentially highly problematic people. Some in our circles will be completely open to it, others to varying degrees. The more we get them open to the idea, the easier it is for that part of the plan to move forward.