I don't see Kash Patel's or Matt Gaetz's names on the letter. The surprise for me,(over and over!), is Mike Pompeo. I thought he was a Trump ally up until he lost all that weight. He doesn't even look remotely the same as he used to. He started doing strange things around that time. To see him on this list confirms to me that he either flipped or he's a top notch actor. Q said that's what makes a great movie- great actors. We shall see.
Gaetz was not a member of the previous Trump administration. Also, all the signatories here were big wigs, heads of their respective departments/committees, etc. Kash was never working on the same level of these guys, and I think it would seem weird if he were included in this grouping.
Thanks 4ever. I've very well aware of Kash Patel in the context of the Q drops, and have been for years!
Sometimes, I think some of us have a way of thinking that just because someone is a white hat or important or doing an important function in the Q operation sense, awakening sense or maga sense, that optics or the way of politics or the way the rest of the world functions isn't important.
All of the signatories to this letter - a letter that is being submitted on a formal basis in a govt. administration situation - are heads of their departments etc. They held very significant formally TOP positions.
"never working on the same level of these guys" = was not working on the same level of POSITION in any formal sense.
Kash did very important, if not critical work. He was an aide to Nunes, a staffer at the Nat. Sec. Council, and later was in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as a principal deputy to Acting Director Grenel.
In the way the world works, you just don't add a junior staff member to a list of signatories like this. It would not make sense, and seem very out of place to all involved.
By the way, this says nothing about the significance of Patel as a player or feature in the current info war. Given his work at Truth Social, and the 'trolling' he and others did around baby q, later Q account at TS, it's not too difficult to imagine that Patel may easily have been or is currently very close to the nexus of the Q operation.
While for some, maybe like yourself, seeing Kash's signature on this letter might inspire some sort of confidence or belief in whether its a good thing or a bad thing or whether people signing it are 'good' or 'bad', contextually, it just would not make sense. I mean, we can be confident that whether the letter / initiative is good or bad, if it is 'good' its purpose and audience is NOT you NOR I nor anons.
We should see and understand what is being done in the context it is being done, and the purpose for which it is done. To me, that's more effective in terms of attempting to apply evaluations, as opposed to whether "the guys I like and trust" signed something or were involved in something. But maybe that's just me?
Personally, it gives me confidence that things are going the way we believe they are going. I’d be concerned if any of the people I mentioned earlier were on the letter. It shows us who is DS.
I don't see Kash Patel's or Matt Gaetz's names on the letter. The surprise for me,(over and over!), is Mike Pompeo. I thought he was a Trump ally up until he lost all that weight. He doesn't even look remotely the same as he used to. He started doing strange things around that time. To see him on this list confirms to me that he either flipped or he's a top notch actor. Q said that's what makes a great movie- great actors. We shall see.
Gaetz was not a member of the previous Trump administration. Also, all the signatories here were big wigs, heads of their respective departments/committees, etc. Kash was never working on the same level of these guys, and I think it would seem weird if he were included in this grouping.
u/#q1482
Thanks 4ever. I've very well aware of Kash Patel in the context of the Q drops, and have been for years!
Sometimes, I think some of us have a way of thinking that just because someone is a white hat or important or doing an important function in the Q operation sense, awakening sense or maga sense, that optics or the way of politics or the way the rest of the world functions isn't important.
All of the signatories to this letter - a letter that is being submitted on a formal basis in a govt. administration situation - are heads of their departments etc. They held very significant formally TOP positions.
"never working on the same level of these guys" = was not working on the same level of POSITION in any formal sense.
Kash did very important, if not critical work. He was an aide to Nunes, a staffer at the Nat. Sec. Council, and later was in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as a principal deputy to Acting Director Grenel.
In the way the world works, you just don't add a junior staff member to a list of signatories like this. It would not make sense, and seem very out of place to all involved.
By the way, this says nothing about the significance of Patel as a player or feature in the current info war. Given his work at Truth Social, and the 'trolling' he and others did around baby q, later Q account at TS, it's not too difficult to imagine that Patel may easily have been or is currently very close to the nexus of the Q operation.
While for some, maybe like yourself, seeing Kash's signature on this letter might inspire some sort of confidence or belief in whether its a good thing or a bad thing or whether people signing it are 'good' or 'bad', contextually, it just would not make sense. I mean, we can be confident that whether the letter / initiative is good or bad, if it is 'good' its purpose and audience is NOT you NOR I nor anons.
We should see and understand what is being done in the context it is being done, and the purpose for which it is done. To me, that's more effective in terms of attempting to apply evaluations, as opposed to whether "the guys I like and trust" signed something or were involved in something. But maybe that's just me?
Personally, it gives me confidence that things are going the way we believe they are going. I’d be concerned if any of the people I mentioned earlier were on the letter. It shows us who is DS.