Thought I would give ai a shot, so used Bard and asked one simple question. Wording and specifications are important. So, how does one go from primordial ooze to human without adding genetic material? Seems like a fair questiin since we're all supposedly here thru happenstance. Conversation follows.
What observable process adds genetic information to an existing mammals genes? No theoretics please, only replicate and observable facts.
expand_moreedit
View other drafts
volume_up
Currently, there are no known observable processes that directly add genetic information to an existing mammal's germline DNA (the DNA that is passed on to offspring) in a way that is replicable and verifiable.
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
I will go further, they can't create life at all right now. They don't know how to create the sugars, they don't know how to create most of the base components. Even if you ignore that and give them every component they still can't make life. Even if you assemble it for them they can't make life. Think about this, you can give them a single cell, and just let it die, we know it was viable, so just bring it back to life. Surely thats easier than creting it from scratch! THEY CANT because they don't even know what life is! There is 0 material difference between a dead cell and a living one when it first dies. They just know one, replicates and moves and uses energy while the other doesn't and decays.
A Joke comes to mind that I heard in Seminary once:
hahha
The Miller–Urey experiment comes to mind.
Ironically, without the "intelligent minds" behind the design of the experiment, the experiment would've failed miserably. Proving that a Mind is, indeed, required.
Darwinian Evolution is a farce - a lie.
Simple syllogism:
DNA = a code (biological definition)
Codes only come from Minds (Observable)
Therefore, DNA came from a Mind
Now, this little argument doesn't get us to the God of the Bible just yet, but it does get us to a Being that existed before Humans with extreme intelligence.
Sprinkle in the Cosmological argument - which gives us a Space-less, Time-less (Eternal), Immaterial (Sprit), and VERY powerful cause for the Universe coming into existence - with the above little argument, and we're quickly approaching the God of the Bible.
The Miller–Urey experiment was a failure for the following reasons:
You are absolutely correct.
My only point was that even if the MU experiment succeeded, it would only succeed in showing that Minds (the scientists) were still needed, essentially supporting the Intelligent Design position.
Correct, and I understood. It's funny how they can believe everything came from nothing, order came from chaos, information came from garbage, and life came from non-life, all of which contradict observation.