Just wanted to point out that he used the examples of Mission Impossible and/or the movie Salt to be examples of people wearing convincing masks. No movie has ever shown an actor wearing a convincing mask, nor have we ever seen someone wearing a convincing mask where they are speaking in close proximity to the camera. Those movies show the actor WHO THE MASK IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT doing the camera work, and then they reveal a quick moment allegedly showing the "spy actor" pulling off a facsimile of a mask. Big difference.
This is not evidence that we have seen masks in use. I don't disagree that it's a possibility that the "Biden actor" is wearing a mask...only that we have never seen a convincing one in use.
I've seen this video. Yes, there are masks, but we have not seen the type of mask claimed that would be required for close camera work. The mask the person interviewed wore in front of the president was only for modest obscurement, and not for close inspection. She did not speak while wearing the mask -- she was only in the room, not directly engaging the president. This is my only point...we have been told about these masks, but not actually shown a working mask that stands up to the level of fakery necessary.
If it was that good, of course I wouldn't. My only comment was that the examples the guy in the video used (in movies) were not actually examples of masks that would pass inspection.
Here's my point.. IF these masks are so good, why didn't they actually make the mask look exactly like how Biden should look? Why on earth is it so obvious that his facial features have changed so much? Why did they design the mask to look so different then his real face, and they seemed to design the mask to appear that he had a face lift.
What I got from his examples is that Hollywood absolutely has the abilities. Austin Powers, Mrs. Doubtfire, The nutty professor etc etc. I don't necessarily think its a man in a mask, just a look alike.
Same article in WSJ but has a paywall so I didn’t link it.
It’s prolly both; mask and double. Why people think it has to be one or the other baffles me.
The DS uses this against us. “They” use several different deceptions to achieve the same goal. Think of all the ways they cheated in the election; ballot stuffing, voting machines, etc. The DS knows that it makes the truth much harder to find, divides the “believers” into different camps and allows “them” to call us crazy. It allows them to control the narrative and gives “them” a talking point if one of their deceptions is discovered.
Ex: Yes, you useless eater, (finally admitting after getting caught) there was ballot stuffing BUT it was not enough to change the election.
The movies you mention use makeup and prosthetic devices, but the actor underneath can always be recognized. The characteristics of the voice can't be changed. We have never seen a mask demonstrated that can actually alter a person's face to mimic another, and be foolproof. I'm not saying they don't perhaps exist, only that we haven't seen a demonstration.
Just wanted to point out that he used the examples of Mission Impossible and/or the movie Salt to be examples of people wearing convincing masks. No movie has ever shown an actor wearing a convincing mask, nor have we ever seen someone wearing a convincing mask where they are speaking in close proximity to the camera. Those movies show the actor WHO THE MASK IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT doing the camera work, and then they reveal a quick moment allegedly showing the "spy actor" pulling off a facsimile of a mask. Big difference.
This is not evidence that we have seen masks in use. I don't disagree that it's a possibility that the "Biden actor" is wearing a mask...only that we have never seen a convincing one in use.
CIA Chief of Disguise.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/videos/cia-chief-of-disguise-hollywood-mask
I've seen this video. Yes, there are masks, but we have not seen the type of mask claimed that would be required for close camera work. The mask the person interviewed wore in front of the president was only for modest obscurement, and not for close inspection. She did not speak while wearing the mask -- she was only in the room, not directly engaging the president. This is my only point...we have been told about these masks, but not actually shown a working mask that stands up to the level of fakery necessary.
“We have been told about these masks, but not actually a working mask that stands up to the level of fakery necessary.”
Here’s my point…how would you know if you’ve “actually shown a working mask that stands up to the level of fakery necessary?”
🙄
If it was that good, of course I wouldn't. My only comment was that the examples the guy in the video used (in movies) were not actually examples of masks that would pass inspection.
Here's my point.. IF these masks are so good, why didn't they actually make the mask look exactly like how Biden should look? Why on earth is it so obvious that his facial features have changed so much? Why did they design the mask to look so different then his real face, and they seemed to design the mask to appear that he had a face lift.
Michael Jackson had a complete makeover into an old fat jerk in his Ghost video. He went out in this gettup and no one noticed anything strange.
What I got from his examples is that Hollywood absolutely has the abilities. Austin Powers, Mrs. Doubtfire, The nutty professor etc etc. I don't necessarily think its a man in a mask, just a look alike.
What about ball chin?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7797415/Former-CIA-head-disguise-unveils-identity-President-Bush.html
Same article in WSJ but has a paywall so I didn’t link it.
It’s prolly both; mask and double. Why people think it has to be one or the other baffles me.
The DS uses this against us. “They” use several different deceptions to achieve the same goal. Think of all the ways they cheated in the election; ballot stuffing, voting machines, etc. The DS knows that it makes the truth much harder to find, divides the “believers” into different camps and allows “them” to call us crazy. It allows them to control the narrative and gives “them” a talking point if one of their deceptions is discovered.
Ex: Yes, you useless eater, (finally admitting after getting caught) there was ballot stuffing BUT it was not enough to change the election.
The movies you mention use makeup and prosthetic devices, but the actor underneath can always be recognized. The characteristics of the voice can't be changed. We have never seen a mask demonstrated that can actually alter a person's face to mimic another, and be foolproof. I'm not saying they don't perhaps exist, only that we haven't seen a demonstration.
Not saying it is the case with biden, but real time facial image morphing with machine learning is a thing. To clean up any loose ends from the mask