It'd be an extremely powerful and quite ridiculous precedent. It would basically allow each Secretary of State to remove candidates whose speech they disapprove of.
It could be weaponized to such a degree that consensus could rapidly emerge that a constitutional amendment was needed to address it.
It'd be an extremely powerful and quite ridiculous precedent. It would basically allow each Secretary of State to remove candidates whose speech they disapprove of.
It could be weaponized to such a degree that consensus could rapidly emerge that a constitutional amendment was needed to address it.