I think that the problem here is: Who has the authority to arrest a treasonous president, without being screamed down as coup-perpetrators? Don't tell me it's the Military. We know what Military coups look like.
The whole Q movement talks about Military tribunals etc., and I believe that is coming, but I don't think they will arrest Biden, without trying to do it democratically (i.e. Congress votes) first.
Although I understand the tit-for-tat logic, the end-game will be that there will be states who ban one candidate, posited against states who ban another. So, that's OK, I suppose, because it will even up, provided there is some sort of balance, i.e., there are enough electoral college votes on each side of the isle to support such shenanigans.
However, it appears, if the swing-state Republicans get their way, that Colorado is already up against three swing states. How many electoral college votes are we talking about, on each side? And how will it look if all the states offer a pruned list?
In any case, taking a candidate off the ballot is depriving the long-suffering state's population of choices, or pre-deciding the results, if you like. So I am not sure how Colorado Republicans, or indeed those swing-state Democrats, and possibly others, are going to react to all this.
Arrest him for treason, problem solved.
I think that the problem here is: Who has the authority to arrest a treasonous president, without being screamed down as coup-perpetrators? Don't tell me it's the Military. We know what Military coups look like.
The whole Q movement talks about Military tribunals etc., and I believe that is coming, but I don't think they will arrest Biden, without trying to do it democratically (i.e. Congress votes) first.
Then charge, try, convict and execute when found guilty.
Simple.
Sounds suspicious to me. Don't we want Biden to be the DNC rep.? Weakest politician in decades.
Although I understand the tit-for-tat logic, the end-game will be that there will be states who ban one candidate, posited against states who ban another. So, that's OK, I suppose, because it will even up, provided there is some sort of balance, i.e., there are enough electoral college votes on each side of the isle to support such shenanigans.
However, it appears, if the swing-state Republicans get their way, that Colorado is already up against three swing states. How many electoral college votes are we talking about, on each side? And how will it look if all the states offer a pruned list?
In any case, taking a candidate off the ballot is depriving the long-suffering state's population of choices, or pre-deciding the results, if you like. So I am not sure how Colorado Republicans, or indeed those swing-state Democrats, and possibly others, are going to react to all this.
Ah. Accelerationism.
Carry on.
Thos will likely force it to the supremes.
Good for them.