Do you not understand what open source means? A lot of great open source programs are written by people we don't know. Just because we don't know who Satoshi is doesn't mean anything if the program is open source... you can read the code line-by-line.
You wanna find the "back door" in the a ONE TRILLION DOLLAR bug bounty, feel free. In fact, it's going to take you at least a couple days, if you catch my drift.
While you're on the sidelines, learn the difference between a skeptic and a cynic. Here's the difference between a cynic and a skeptic when it comes to research and effort:
Cynics tend to be distrustful of others and their motives, and they may be more likely to dismiss or ignore evidence that contradicts their beliefs. Cynics often have a negative outlook on the world and may see research and effort as futile. Skeptics, on the other hand, are open-minded and willing to consider evidence and arguments that may challenge their existing beliefs. They are willing to put in the effort to research and evaluate claims critically, and they are often motivated by a desire to seek the truth.
So, while a cynic may dismiss research and effort as pointless, a skeptic is more likely to see it as a necessary part of the process of seeking the truth. In short, skepticism is about being open-minded and critical, while cynicism is about being distrustful and pessimistic.
Ponder your existence. Dipshit skeptics don't last long on GAW.
If upon meeting resistance to your opinion you immediately resort to personal attacks you either dont know that much about the subject or have lost the argument or both. In this case its both! Lol. Merry Christmas!
We aren't trying to talk you out of your unbelief. But your statement reveals you have studied nothing and can't even complain about it constructively. I don't own any digital currency, but i surely would use it if that's all I needed to engage a transfer of real money. I probably wouldn't hold much of it but i won't hold any fiat soon.
Imagine where every transaction being traceable. Now apply that to govt spending and you cant create bitcoin out of thin air like fractional reserve banking and loan out debt upon debt and have nothing backing it. The military created bitcoin. This has been gamed out at least a decade ago. Watch Jason Lowery's speeches from MIT / space force.
I 100% don't mean this in a rude way, but, how are you on GAW and don't know this?
The coins are also cryptographically limited in supply. There are currently only 2 million left to be mined between now and 2140—a date which, alone, should tell you just how long the Q plan extends past 2024. Another 116 years still yet to go.
No single person or entity gets to issue bitcoin. They are mined by a global network of computer nodes that anyone can join and contribute to. There is no single point of control or failure.
And they are not created from thin air. They are created by the network brute force guessing the answer to inhumanly complex math puzzles, quadrillions of times per second. The electricity (physical energy) expended to do this is where bitcoin's backing comes from. It requires more energy to mine a single bitcoin block than to pull gold or silver out of the ground.
And what if Bitcoin was created by the Deep State with a back door???
Santoshi doesn’t exist people… wake up.
Smells of DARPA if you ask me.
Bitcoin is open-source; its design is public, nobody owns or controls Bitcoin and everyone can take part.
Smells of low-info, low-effort research if you ask me
You keep telling yourself that… Fn Sheeple.
Do some actual research on Santoshi…. Way above your mental power no doubt but learn Gematria and the esoteric meaning of Bitcoin.
Do you not understand what open source means? A lot of great open source programs are written by people we don't know. Just because we don't know who Satoshi is doesn't mean anything if the program is open source... you can read the code line-by-line.
You can't even spell Satoshi.
You wanna find the "back door" in the a ONE TRILLION DOLLAR bug bounty, feel free. In fact, it's going to take you at least a couple days, if you catch my drift.
While you're on the sidelines, learn the difference between a skeptic and a cynic. Here's the difference between a cynic and a skeptic when it comes to research and effort:
Cynics tend to be distrustful of others and their motives, and they may be more likely to dismiss or ignore evidence that contradicts their beliefs. Cynics often have a negative outlook on the world and may see research and effort as futile. Skeptics, on the other hand, are open-minded and willing to consider evidence and arguments that may challenge their existing beliefs. They are willing to put in the effort to research and evaluate claims critically, and they are often motivated by a desire to seek the truth.
So, while a cynic may dismiss research and effort as pointless, a skeptic is more likely to see it as a necessary part of the process of seeking the truth. In short, skepticism is about being open-minded and critical, while cynicism is about being distrustful and pessimistic.
Ponder your existence. Dipshit skeptics don't last long on GAW.
If upon meeting resistance to your opinion you immediately resort to personal attacks you either dont know that much about the subject or have lost the argument or both. In this case its both! Lol. Merry Christmas!
Its Satoshi.
Merry Christmas you filthy animals.
We aren't trying to talk you out of your unbelief. But your statement reveals you have studied nothing and can't even complain about it constructively. I don't own any digital currency, but i surely would use it if that's all I needed to engage a transfer of real money. I probably wouldn't hold much of it but i won't hold any fiat soon.
Imagine where every transaction being traceable. Now apply that to govt spending and you cant create bitcoin out of thin air like fractional reserve banking and loan out debt upon debt and have nothing backing it. The military created bitcoin. This has been gamed out at least a decade ago. Watch Jason Lowery's speeches from MIT / space force.
U either learn about how they ALL work or you become slave to what the government makes you use. Kinda like most people are now.
Who gets to create these magical bitcoins out of thin air ?
I 100% don't mean this in a rude way, but, how are you on GAW and don't know this?
The coins are also cryptographically limited in supply. There are currently only 2 million left to be mined between now and 2140—a date which, alone, should tell you just how long the Q plan extends past 2024. Another 116 years still yet to go.
They are mined with energy and cryptographically unique
No single person or entity gets to issue bitcoin. They are mined by a global network of computer nodes that anyone can join and contribute to. There is no single point of control or failure.
And they are not created from thin air. They are created by the network brute force guessing the answer to inhumanly complex math puzzles, quadrillions of times per second. The electricity (physical energy) expended to do this is where bitcoin's backing comes from. It requires more energy to mine a single bitcoin block than to pull gold or silver out of the ground.