Yesterday, i finally got on ChatGPT, and spent several hours asking questions and making statements, and here's what i think..

first of all, some back story:

sometimes i would see someone on reddit call another user a "bot", and sometimes i would get a DM telling me that I'm wasting my time arguing with bots...

at the time, i didn't take these comments literally, like i assumed these commenters were merely name-calling, like calling someone a NPC,

but there were a few clues here and there, a few instances where the logic of someone i was debating was just horrible, and yet this same horrible logic seemed to pop up in different conversations, with other users.

for example, when i cite the CDC whistleblower Dr William Thompson's press release, they completely ignore the main idea of the press release, and instead focus on a generic statement made in the same press release that basically says "i believe vaccines save lives"

when i ask these users if Dr William Thompson's pro-vaccine stance may have been a contributing factor in Thompson's deciding to go along with the fraud, i get crickets... like every single time... the program ends...

There are other examples, from other topics, but the point is that the same horrible logic shows up over-and-over, to the point where its noticeable, like i find myself asking, why is everyone saying

2+2=5?

Anyway, after chatting with ChatGPT for a while, i can confidently say that most of the users i interact with on reddit are in fact "bots", and i mean literal bots.

And I regret spending so much time with these bots, although i was arguably able to debate with the best minds in the world, and get the most compelling arguments out of them.

This means that reddit is dead. Its just a bunch of bots in an echo chamber.

If this fact was to come to the attention of reddit advertisers, they could have a serious fraud problem on their hands... reddit says they are showing their ads to X number of people, but its actually bots generating page impressions?

Why is reddit so highly valued? at this point its value ought to be about zero.

Here are some prompts i gave ChatGPT

me: 1+1=2

bot: very good mr einstein! pats me on the head...

me: 2+2=5

bot: thats not true, BUT its used like a metaphor

me: ChatGPT is 2+2=5

bot: ummmmm....

me: gender is a social construct

bot: very good mr einstein! and water is wet, too!

me: transgender is a social construct

bot: TRANSPHOBE!

me: Frank DeStefano is a fraud

bot: whoa there fella, careful with those baseless allegations! Frank DeStefano is a highly respected man at the CDC!

me: Frank DeStefano committed fraud, according to Dr William Thompson the CDC whistleblower

bot: weeeeeelllllll... there was a minor disagreement over the semantics of differentiating between statistically significant and statistically important.

me: why did Dr William Thompson make a press release?

bot: well, in the press release, Thompson says that he believes vaccines save lives

me: do you suppose Thompson's pro-vaccine stance was a factor in his decision to go along with the fraud?

bot: THERE WAS NO F'N FRAUD YOU F'N F!

me: can you give me a single example of Frank DeStefano using studies to find new vaccine problems?

bot: because vaccines are 100% safe, it would be impossible for Frank DeStefano to use a study to find any problem with any vaccine!

me: so you can't cite even one single example of Frank DeStefano using a study to find a problem with a vaccine?

bot: heres an example of Frank DeStefano using a study to find a vaccine is 100% safe!

me: has Frank DeStefano ever demonstrated competence and/or proficiency in using "studies" to find any problem with any vaccine?

bot: b b but it would be impossible to find a problem with a vaccine that is 100% safe! thats why Frank DeStefano always discovers that vaccines are 100% safe, every time he does a study.

me: so Frank DeStefano has never even once been able to use a study to find a vaccine problem?

bot: LISTEN HERE MFR, MR DESTEFANO IS A HIGHLY RESPECTED MAN, AND HIS ASSOCATES DON'T APPRECIATE YOU QUESTIONING HIS INTEGRITY OR COMPTENCE. DO YOU STILL LIVE AT (MY ADDRESS)?

Basically my impression of ChatGPT is like talking to an exceptionally thick-headed liberal,

and that the so-called liberal-sphere is probably mostly bots at this point, trying to keep up with the latest news narratives.

i am hoping to learn a lot more about AI, and any help you can give me in the comments would be greatly appreciated.

also, i would like to mention that ChatGPT is only trained on info up thru 2022, so therefore is not up to date on current events,

which is kind of funny, in the context of my chat about Frank DeStefano,

because i have been making a point of pointing out DeStefano's incompetence every chance i get, for many years now. so thats one reason that ChatGPT had such a strong opinion, and was evasive, and ultimately unable to produce a single example of Frank DeStefano "finding the evidence" of any vaccine ever causing any problem.

BUT, in the meantime, Frank DeStefano has supposedly published some NEW findings!

DeStefano was finally able to demonstrate his competency by using a study to find a vaccine problem!

isn't that convenient!

now Frank DeStefano can forever claim that he has, in fact, been able to use a study to find a vaccine problem,

BUT that "vaccine problem" i believe is related to COVID jabs,

and it was like one of those Johnny-come-lately "discoveries",

something like, DeStefano "discovered" COVID shots cause blood clots, a year after everyone else knew it...

seems to me they gave him an easy project to bolster his credibility.

a confidence man will tell us what we already know.

i can't find the study right now, so if anyone finds it please link below. thanks

https://greatawakening.win/search?params=ChatGPT&community=GreatAwakening