https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
In all this, you have never enunciated any meaning from her statements than is on their face. There is no blot. There is no meaning. You haven't shown otherwise. And I doubt there is a puzzle. I go outside my door to see the world, with its trees and clouds and light and moisture, and there is a lot of meaning for the discerning and insightful viewer, and it is no blot. There is clutter and there is meaning, and you have chosen to confuse the two. Life is too short to unscramble blots. Better to recognize them for what they are and move on.
What do you mean by "meaning from her statement" ?
That's what I am trying to ask you. You contend that some sort of meaning can be extracted from Jan Halper's apology and correction---beyond the obvious apology and correction. I'm all ears. Please elucidate.
So whats the obvious conclusion you extract from the apology?
And what did she correct?
The obvious (from reading her text): She was mistaken, and she is sorry. End of message.
This has been a prolonged exchange, and you have not come forward with ANY other meaning. Only assertions that there could be other meaning. You are dead in the water. You cannot put up, so you should (deduce the meaning).